This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Merging gdc (GNU D Compiler) into gcc

From: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gmail dot com>
To: David Brown <david dot brown at hesbynett dot no>
Cc: Iain Buclaw <ibuclaw at ubuntu dot com>, Ian Lance Taylor <iant at google dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2011 14:47:25 -0700
Subject: Re: Merging gdc (GNU D Compiler) into gcc
References: <CABOHX+dzM9GCCBX5G-yyenya2rW89p+2X1=YUWXrTssmaQgJ8g@mail.gmail.com> <mcrsjn8q2gi.fsf@coign.corp.google.com> <CABOHX+f63imd7rkTSTR+N0p2_KPttn4gED-pxx0qfFiSyaPjAQ@mail.gmail.com> <CA+=Sn1nQfOAgH8QobPOJdHRiKxNSGxmxENK8p+EYAsXeR7Jp=Q@mail.gmail.com> <4E8B7D63.3070206@hesbynett.no>

On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 2:40 PM, David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> wrote:
> "naked" functions are often useful in embedded systems, and are therefore
> useful (and implemented) on many gcc targets. ÂIt would make sense to have
> the attribute available universally in gcc, if that doesn't involve a lot of
> extra work, even though it is of little use on "big" systems (Linux,
> Windows, etc.).

Is it really useful if you can have a small top-level inline-asm wrapper?

-- Pinski

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Merging gdc (GNU D Compiler) into gcc
  - From: David Brown

References:
- Merging gdc (GNU D Compiler) into gcc
  - From: Iain Buclaw
- Re: Merging gdc (GNU D Compiler) into gcc
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: Merging gdc (GNU D Compiler) into gcc
  - From: Iain Buclaw
- Re: Merging gdc (GNU D Compiler) into gcc
  - From: Andrew Pinski
- Re: Merging gdc (GNU D Compiler) into gcc
  - From: David Brown

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]