This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: GCC 4.7.0 Status Report (2011-09-09)
- From: Aldy Hernandez <aldyh at redhat dot com>
- To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
- Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>, triegel at redhat dot com
- Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2011 08:51:04 -0500
- Subject: Re: GCC 4.7.0 Status Report (2011-09-09)
- References: <20110909070930.GP27949@sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz>
- Reply-to: aldyh at redhat dot com
Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> writes:
> In particular, is transactional-memory branch mergeable within
> a month and half, at least some parts of cxx-mem-model branch,
> bitfield lowering? What is the status of lra, reload-2a, pph,
Torvald and I are looking into getting things merge read, but...
The main problem seems to be that the TM community still hasn't formally
submitted the C++ changes to the standards committee, and are still
swinging between two alternate syntax implementations. So unless, this
gets resolved in the next month, transactional memory will have to sit
this one out.
Torvald, is this a fair assessment?