This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: RFC: Improving support for known testsuite failures

On 08/09/11 12:33, Diego Novillo wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 07:16, Richard Guenther
> <richard.guenther@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> Well, you'd need to maintain a list of known XPASS/FAILs anyway.
> 
> Yes, of course.  That's the manifest of things you expect to be broken.
> 

And that's only going to work if all the test names are unique.  I
currently see quite a few tests that appear in my log as both PASS and
FAIL in a single run.  For example:

FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/stackalign/non-local-goto-2.c  -Os  execution test
PASS: gcc.dg/torture/stackalign/non-local-goto-2.c  -Os  execution test

FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/stackalign/setjmp-3.c  -Os  execution test
PASS: gcc.dg/torture/stackalign/setjmp-3.c  -Os  execution test

R.
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]