This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Generate annotations for a binary translator

From: ééä <chenwj at iis dot sinica dot edu dot tw>
To: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 15:07:33 +0800
Subject: Re: Generate annotations for a binary translator
References: <mcrtycz8aaa.fsf@coign.corp.google.com> <20110516085156.GA67683@cs.nctu.edu.tw> <mcrei3y4cmh.fsf@coign.corp.google.com> <20110517053946.GA99002@cs.nctu.edu.tw> <mcrzkmlzur7.fsf@coign.corp.google.com> <20110517090528.GA56624@cs.nctu.edu.tw> <20110609053825.GA68628@cs.nctu.edu.tw> <mcr8vtb7bn1.fsf@coign.corp.google.com> <20110609070510.GA70020@cs.nctu.edu.tw> <mcr4o3z6tc6.fsf@coign.corp.google.com>

> The machine reorg pass in particular can change anything, and may change
> the CFG.  The delay slots pass may also change the CFG.  It depends on
> your particular target.

  From the comments and source code in gcc/reorg.c, I guess both machine
reorg pass and delay slots pass are for delayed-branch scheduling. And
you said it depends on particular target. Did you mean those architectures
have branch delay slot, like those listed in the comments in gcc/reorg.c? 

Regards,
chenwj

-- 
Wei-Ren Chen (ééä)
Computer Systems Lab, Institute of Information Science,
Academia Sinica, Taiwan (R.O.C.)
Tel:886-2-2788-3799 #1667

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Generate annotations for a binary translator
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor

References:
- Re: Generate annotations for a binary translator
  - From: ééä
- Re: Generate annotations for a binary translator
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: Generate annotations for a binary translator
  - From: ééä
- Re: Generate annotations for a binary translator
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]