This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: pedwarn_cxx98 and enum { foo, }

From: Paolo Carlini <paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com>
To: Magnus Fromreide <magfr at lysator dot liu dot se>
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, Manuel López-Ibáñez <lopezibanez at gmail dot com>
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 15:44:53 +0200
Subject: Re: pedwarn_cxx98 and enum { foo, }
References: <1303986909.3595.13.camel@sara>

On 04/28/2011 12:35 PM, Magnus Fromreide wrote:

So, now I would like to know if there is something amiss with
pedwarn_cxx98 or the comment above it?

Looking at the way pedwarn_cxx98 is used for long long (the original motivating case), think the right way to use it for your issue too seems having something more precise than just OPT_pedantic as the second argument. Or do something else altogether, like just not calling any warning when the dialect is != cxx98. The right person to help you is Manuel, I think.

Paolo.

References:
- pedwarn_cxx98 and enum { foo, }
  - From: Magnus Fromreide

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]