This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES vs. libtool

From: Paolo Bonzini <bonzini at gnu dot org>
To: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: Ian Lance Taylor <iant at google dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 18:02:59 +0200
Subject: Re: GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES vs. libtool
References: <mcr8vvy8oz6.fsf@google.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1103291125330.26447@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>

On 03/29/2011 01:33 PM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:

But some of
those bug reports refer to target libiberty - which I still maintain
should never be built by GCC - and some to target zlib, which I think
should only be relevant when building Java.

Agreed on both counts.

Paolo

References:
- GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES vs. libtool
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES vs. libtool
  - From: Joseph S. Myers

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]