This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: gcc-4.5/4.4: Bug in .subreg1 pass?

From: Denis Chertykov <chertykov at gmail dot com>
To: Georg Johann Lay <avr at gjlay dot de>
Cc: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at adacore dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, Jeff Law <law at redhat dot com>, Paul Koning <paul_koning at dell dot com>, Michael Matz <matz at suse dot de>
Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2011 15:15:37 +0300
Subject: Re: gcc-4.5/4.4: Bug in .subreg1 pass?
References: <4D66659D.4060300@gjlay.de> <2D5ECE31-6687-4D16-B615-DE9EEB9CE587@dell.com> <4D6807A6.8060605@gjlay.de> <201102252244.34339.ebotcazou@adacore.com> <4D682739.4070409@gjlay.de>

2011/2/26 Georg Johann Lay <avr@gjlay.de>
>
> Eric Botcazou schrieb:
>>>
>>> What does "word" mean here? Is it a 32-bit entity or is it according to
>>> word_mode which is QImode for avr?
>>
>> The latter, it is machine-dependent.
>>
>>
>>> So the same should be true for QI-subregs of scalar modes if
>>> UNITS_PER_WORT = 1. Right?
>>
>> Right.
>
> Thanks for that definite clarification.

As I understand PR46779 and PR45291 no longer an AVR port bugs.
And the following comment is not a true anymore:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45291#c2
Am I right ?

Denis.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: gcc-4.5/4.4: Bug in .subreg1 pass?
  - From: Georg-Johann Lay

References:
- gcc-4.5/4.4: Bug in .subreg1 pass?
  - From: Georg-Johann Lay
- Re: gcc-4.5/4.4: Bug in .subreg1 pass?
  - From: Paul Koning
- Re: gcc-4.5/4.4: Bug in .subreg1 pass?
  - From: Georg Johann Lay
- Re: gcc-4.5/4.4: Bug in .subreg1 pass?
  - From: Eric Botcazou
- Re: gcc-4.5/4.4: Bug in .subreg1 pass?
  - From: Georg Johann Lay

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]