This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: AspectG++ ?

From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com>
To: David Lanzendörfer <david dot lanzendoerfer at o2s dot ch>
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 20:46:30 +0000
Subject: Re: AspectG++ ?
References: <201102181056.51325.david.lanzendoerfer@o2s.ch> <20110218175803.GE16848@synopsys.com> <201102182127.02561.david.lanzendoerfer@o2s.ch>

On 18 February 2011 20:26, David Lanzendörfer wrote:
> I'm NO compiler architect, but from my point of perspective - please correct
> me if I'm wrong - for adding support for AOP into C/C++ part of gcc, only minor
> changes would be needed.

Even if that's true (I don't know, but adding almost anything to g++
is difficult) the point is not "can it be done" but whether someone
would be willing to maintain and support the changes.  If not, the
code will rot and stop working and eventually have to be removed.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: AspectG++ ?
  - From: Joel Sherrill

References:
- AspectG++ ?
  - From: David Lanzendörfer
- Re: AspectG++ ?
  - From: Joe Buck
- Re: AspectG++ ?
  - From: David Lanzendörfer

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]