This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: GCC 4.6 performance regressions

From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com>
To: Sebastian Pop <sebpop at gmail dot com>
Cc: Xinliang David Li <davidxl at google dot com>, Tony Poppleton <tony dot poppleton at gmail dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2011 23:35:30 +0000
Subject: Re: GCC 4.6 performance regressions
References: <AANLkTi=KvNqTtrYLJs6GARhKxytwKVWV6HO-zx_Doxj4@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTi=jmnSvMdv-7pMaoSCsBATfEHWwAyeYOFjNFA08@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTinHVhUhTewzsz6Jcv8bgp_iFr8ShLZjQ2PPr3UD@mail.gmail.com>

On 8 February 2011 22:49, Sebastian Pop wrote:
>
> Because phoronix uses make -j the compile times are highly random.

Don't they know how to use 'time' to measure something more useful?
I wouldn't be entirely surprised, last time I looked they didn't seem
to know to use --enable-checking=release when comparing compile time
of snapshots against releases.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: GCC 4.6 performance regressions
  - From: Miles Bader

References:
- GCC 4.6 performance regressions
  - From: Tony Poppleton
- Re: GCC 4.6 performance regressions
  - From: Xinliang David Li
- Re: GCC 4.6 performance regressions
  - From: Sebastian Pop

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]