This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
sparc-rtems recent test regressions
- From: Joel Sherrill <joel dot sherrill at oarcorp dot com>
- To: "gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 08:19:01 -0600
- Subject: sparc-rtems recent test regressions
Hi,
In the past few days, something has regressed
on the sparc. Revision 169143 only had 699 failures
and ~100 of those were LTO related. David Korn's
patch seems to have resolved those. Revision 169504
has 2231 failures.
http://www.rtems.org/pipermail/rtems-tooltestresults/2011-January/000407.html
=== gcc Summary ===
# of expected passes 67336
# of unexpected failures 699
# of expected failures 223
# of unresolved testcases 128
# of unsupported tests 1233
/users/joel/test-gcc/b-gcc1-sparc/gcc/xgcc version 4.6.0 20110123
(experimental) [trunk revision 169143] (GCC)
http://www.rtems.org/pipermail/rtems-tooltestresults/2011-February/000440.html
=== gcc Summary ===
# of expected passes 64480
# of unexpected failures 2231
# of expected failures 226
# of unresolved testcases 50
# of unsupported tests 1247
/users/joel/test-gcc/b-gcc1-sparc/gcc/xgcc version 4.6.0 20110201
(experimental) [trunk revision 169504] (GCC)
Any ideas?
--
Joel Sherrill, Ph.D. Director of Research& Development
joel.sherrill@OARcorp.com On-Line Applications Research
Ask me about RTEMS: a free RTOS Huntsville AL 35805
Support Available (256) 722-9985