This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Bumping DATESTAMP (was: GCC 4.3.5 Status Report (2010-05-22))
- From: Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>
- To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald at pfeifer dot com>, Dongsheng Song <dongsheng dot song at gmail dot com>, "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>, NightStrike <nightstrike at gmail dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 14:32:16 +0100
- Subject: Re: Bumping DATESTAMP (was: GCC 4.3.5 Status Report (2010-05-22))
- References: <AANLkTikwR2VZuowxH4ijoHghs2qIdaTiehYzu9UF2_R1@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTi=N-x87fDAD3uzR6Ady--k7Gtj48TgxwukRBA45@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.LNX.2.00.1101302252110.14698@gerinyyl.fvgr> <AANLkTinBdPUZ2F88Eo2dFjC_kRXycUrmWni0t__KwPhX@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTika1RB7qMcjbB9FLSHpU-hsgZBOtUei2H7=-PYw@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTi=R6pa3JBjSDf_=WoZEwXB6he_1BuwXCaZL_Cuc@mail.gmail.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1101311753400.4363@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <AANLkTimNTVb4-rOc+7eSS9Vz_c-UADvCG1BXxgsu1F6a@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTin57_TqdtUKR+eLOCcrkY6pVr3_SdW=hKhKkzCK@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.LNX.2.00.1102011613030.14698@gerinyyl.fvgr> <20110202132922.GC13037@sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz>
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 2:29 PM, Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 04:32:51PM +0100, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
>> On Tue, 1 Feb 2011, Dongsheng Song wrote:
>> >> The DATESTAMP change could also be in a post-commit hook (doing
>> >> nothing if the date didn't change, of course). ?No idea whether
>> >> this is technically possible of course.
>> > Yes, the post-commit hook can do this task.
>> > If we really want to do that, ?I can update the current post-commit
>> > hook script [1].
>>
>> I'd love to see that and will be happy to work on this with you,
>> apply a patch, etc.
>>
>> Let's give others the chance to chime in, and if there are no
>> objections within the next two days, let's proceed. ?Fair?
>
> I'd say it should go into a pre-commit hook instead of
> post-commit, if possible. ?So that when one checks in some particular
> revision DATESTAMP already has the right timestamp.
I wonder if it can go into the same commit even?
Richard.