This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: NetBSD bootstrap (was: Target deprecations for 4.6)

From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com>
To: Arnaud Lacombe <lacombar at gmail dot com>
Cc: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 00:50:27 +0000
Subject: Re: NetBSD bootstrap (was: Target deprecations for 4.6)
References: <AANLkTi=O3M=yFfx-dMEE1Bb74vfyGXhOVWgYMeYkEbj6@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTinRgXjXWdLdoBf3n+c7zqceCDNPi0tXzuhxYBWp@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTinY0j0yA2vPZASLfnLYz+cTOECiixs+rWyVsD2-@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTiktSeRMCjEc8KF3h_1YK4D9D9dS-6bZO1kmKX5b@mail.gmail.com>

On 31 January 2011 00:25, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 5:24 PM, Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Ah, I did look in the NetBSD cvs repository and the other arches I
>> looked at just used _ANSI_H_, I obviously didn't check the ones you
>> identified.
>>
> From a quick look, dreamcast, landisk, hpcsh, usermode and evbsh3 use
> fancy header protection guard for <machine/ansi.h>. Should the bug
> report be re-opened agaist those arch, or can it be expected that
> nobody will ever use a recent gcc on those arch ?

I have no objection to it being reopened, but I don't plan to work on it myself.

References:
- NetBSD bootstrap (was: Target deprecations for 4.6)
  - From: Jonathan Wakely
- Re: NetBSD bootstrap (was: Target deprecations for 4.6)
  - From: Arnaud Lacombe
- Re: NetBSD bootstrap (was: Target deprecations for 4.6)
  - From: Jonathan Wakely
- Re: NetBSD bootstrap (was: Target deprecations for 4.6)
  - From: Arnaud Lacombe

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]