This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: cloog(-parma) 0.16 and ppl 0.11 in infrastructure?
- From: Jack Howarth <howarth at bromo dot med dot uc dot edu>
- To: Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>
- Cc: sebpop at gmail dot com, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2011 09:23:25 -0500
- Subject: Re: cloog(-parma) 0.16 and ppl 0.11 in infrastructure?
- References: <20101230234035.GA7287@bromo.med.uc.edu> <AANLkTimKUnDCjLWdSK5mYp7FFjTsiLkF3VsVVCJJGnyJ@mail.gmail.com>
On Sun, Jan 02, 2011 at 04:55:09PM +0100, Richard Guenther wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 31, 2010@12:40 AM, Jack Howarth <howarth@bromo.med.uc.edu> wrote:
> > Sebastian,
> > ? ?It appears that the official tarballs are now posted@http://www.cloog.org/
> > for cloog and cloog-parma 0.16. Do you plan on placing those both in the infrastructure
> > directory@gcc.gnu.org's ftp site? If so, the newer ppl 0.11 tarball should be added
> > as well. If those files are updated, we should be set to switch gcc trunk to require
> > ppl >= 0.11, cloog >= 0.16 and the default cloog backend from legacy cloog-ppl to
> > cloog-isl.
>
> I don't think this is a very good idea@this point.
Richard,
How about for gcc 4.6.1? It seems a shame to push the conversion to cloog.org
in graphite to the next release. Hopefully enough of the remaining loop and
vectorization issues with graphite can be ironed out by gcc 4.7 such that defaulting
-fgraphite-identity for -O2 might finally be considered.
Jack
>
> Richard.
>
> > ? ? ? ? ?Jack
> >
> >