This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [Bulk] Re: x86 assembler syntax
Tim,
Nice. It reads: "3.2.3. Intel syntax - Good news are that starting from
binutils 2.10 release, GAS supports Intel syntax too. It can be
triggered with .intel_syntax directive. Unfortunately this mode is not
documented (yet?) in the official binutils manual, so if you want to use
it, try to examine http://www.lxhp.in-berlin.de/lhpas86.html, which is
an extract from AMD 64bit port of binutils 2.11."
I tried a sample with asm(".intel_syntax; int 3") and it seemed to
compile/assemble that line correctly, instead of asm("int $0x3"). But
my other AT&T syntax commands all failed after that. So, this directive
must be a global setting, and not an instance-by-instance setting.
Thanks for the search, Tim. :-)
- Rick
On Sun, 2010-08-08 at 23:37 -0700, Tim Prince wrote:
> On 8/8/2010 10:21 PM, Rick C. Hodgin wrote:
> > All,
> >
> > Is there an Intel-syntax compatible option for GCC or G++? And if not,
> > why not? It's so much cleaner than AT&T's.
> >
> > - Rick C. Hodgin
> >
> >
> >
> I don't know how you get along without a search engine. What about
> http://tldp.org/HOWTO/Assembly-HOWTO/gas.html ?
>