This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK

From: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>
To: Jeff Law <law at redhat dot com>
Cc: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>, "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>, Ian Lance Taylor <iant at google dot com>, GCC <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2010 21:36:12 -0500
Subject: Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK
References: <4C030228.8020201@codesourcery.com> <mcrhblnnuz3.fsf@dhcp-172-17-9-151.mtv.corp.google.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1006042002430.20285@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <4C099EE2.5030606@codesourcery.com> <4C09A098.7030205@redhat.com>

On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 7:55 PM, Jeff Law <law@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 06/04/10 18:48, Mark Mitchell wrote:
>>
>> ? In C++, you can of course make what looks like
>> simple code do something expensive; for example, you can make "a + b" be
>> arbitrarily complex if "a" and "b" are instances of class types and you
>> have overloaded "+".
>>
>
> And, in general, we are trying to avoid situations where seemingly simple
> code does something expensive, right?

Yes.  I trust reviewers to spot instances where people are being creative
with expensive operations.

-- Gaby

References:
- Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK
  - From: Joseph S. Myers
- Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK
  - From: Jeff Law

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]