This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK
- From: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha at arm dot com>
- To: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
- Cc: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at adacore dot com>, Paolo Bonzini <bonzini at gnu dot org>, Andreas Schwab <schwab at redhat dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2010 13:58:59 +0100
- Subject: Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK
- References: <4C030228.firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com> <4C0386ED.firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com> <4C03D869.firstname.lastname@example.org>
On Mon, 2010-05-31 at 08:40 -0700, Mark Mitchell wrote:
> Eric Botcazou wrote:
> >> We do require long long for 32->64 cross compilers.
> > Right, only in this case, and I don't see why this should be changed with the
> > transition to C++, that's orthogonal.
> I agree.
We need it for any configuration that defines need_64bit_hwint=yes in
config.gcc. Those are mostly 64-bit (or include a variant that is), but
I don't see anything that restricts it to that).