This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: LTO and libelf (and FreeBSD)

From: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald at pfeifer dot com>
To: Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>
Cc: Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu>, Kai Wang <kaiw at FreeBSD dot org>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, Joseph Koshy <jkoshy at freebsd dot org>
Date: Sat, 22 May 2010 23:52:07 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: Re: LTO and libelf (and FreeBSD)
References: <20100522202934.GA17067@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <AANLkTik9xQsro7wkjG1b_ydwbpcTE8IoZxrNQbfMTTFk@mail.gmail.com>

On Sat, 22 May 2010, Richard Guenther wrote:
> Hm, so you didn't test FreeBSD's libelf without Kias patch but my GCC patch
> applied.  (at least my patch doesn't make the situation worse for any case
> it seems)

I'll be submitting result for that around noon your time tomorrow-
Right now I am testing vanilla GCC and patched FreeBSD libelf, my
tester is just rather slow.

> I would apply my patch as a reasonable workaround for (parts of)
> the FreeBSD libelf problems if it alone makes a difference.

Yes, that sounds like a good plan provided my testing shows the
expected benefit.  After all, existing FreeBSD installations do
have the older FreeBSD libelf, so whatever we can address in GCC
will be helpful.

Gerald

Follow-Ups:
- Re: LTO and libelf (and FreeBSD)
  - From: Gerald Pfeifer

References:
- Re: LTO and libelf (and FreeBSD)
  - From: Steve Kargl
- Re: LTO and libelf (and FreeBSD)
  - From: Richard Guenther

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]