This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Poor internal documentation (was: dragonegg in FSF gcc?)
* Ian Lance Taylor (email@example.com) [20100413 00:41]:
> Details of GIMPLE IR: poor.
> Details of tree IR: poor.
> How to write a new optimization pass: poor.
> How to write a new frontend: nonexistent.
> General overview of compiler source: nonexistent.
> Overview of internal compiler datastructures: nonexistent.
I'd say these these warrant an additional bullet "Documentation" under
"Improving GCC" on the GCC wiki that then lists (at least) these points.
It's not much, but it at least shows the GCC developers are aware and just
maybe it does attract the interest of someone.