This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

dragonegg in FSF gcc?


   What are the opinions here about merging
dragonegg into FSF gcc? It is in the odd position
of straddling two projects so perhaps it could
reside in both the LLVM and FSF gcc projects
with regularly remerging. Certainly it would be
an interesting addition to FSF gcc. For instance,
without even attempting to target gfortran, in
the last year, the llvm code performance has
improved about 15% for the Polyhedron 2005
benchmarks...

http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2010-April/030800.html

For the darwin target, this would be a particularly
big win since we would gain access to the llvm LTO.
Thanks in advance for any comments.
                        Jack


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]