This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: LTO and LTO Plugin Reviewers

From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
To: Basile STARYNKEVITCH <basile at starynkevitch dot net>
Cc: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at google dot com>, David Edelsohn <edelsohn at gnu dot org>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, espindola at google dot com, ccoutant at google dot com, rguenther at suse dot de
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 10:34:28 -0400
Subject: Re: LTO and LTO Plugin Reviewers
References: <E1MvWhf-0001VT-KA@fencepost.gnu.org> <4ACC9DBC.90505@starynkevitch.net> <b798aad50910070702t2a54a1e6ob10e216c85527e75@mail.gmail.com> <4ACCA163.2010709@starynkevitch.net> <b798aad50910070712t65012becid46c321662a8ab83@mail.gmail.com> <4ACCA5C9.70202@starynkevitch.net>

On Wed, Oct 07, 2009 at 04:29:29PM +0200, Basile STARYNKEVITCH wrote:
> I suppose LTO plugins means plugin dlopen-ed in lto-plugin/lto-symtab.c

It sounds to me like this confusion comes from "LTO plugins".  Isn't
it just "LTO plugin"?  That is, a specific plugin?

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery

Follow-Ups:
- Re: LTO and LTO Plugin Reviewers
  - From: Diego Novillo
- Re: LTO and LTO Plugin Reviewers
  - From: Rafael Espindola

References:
- LTO and LTO Plugin Reviewers
  - From: David Edelsohn
- Re: LTO and LTO Plugin Reviewers
  - From: Basile STARYNKEVITCH
- Re: LTO and LTO Plugin Reviewers
  - From: Diego Novillo
- Re: LTO and LTO Plugin Reviewers
  - From: Basile STARYNKEVITCH
- Re: LTO and LTO Plugin Reviewers
  - From: Diego Novillo
- Re: LTO and LTO Plugin Reviewers
  - From: Basile STARYNKEVITCH

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]