This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: new libstdc++-v3 decimal failures
- From: Janis Johnson <janis187 at us dot ibm dot com>
- To: Jack Howarth <howarth at bromo dot med dot uc dot edu>
- Cc: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2009 16:12:50 -0700
- Subject: Re: new libstdc++-v3 decimal failures
- References: <20091006153430.5d9f149a@mcgee.artheist.org> <20091006225609.GA9663@bromo.med.uc.edu>
- Reply-to: janis187 at us dot ibm dot com
On Tue, 2009-10-06 at 18:56 -0400, Jack Howarth wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 03:34:30PM -0700, Benjamin Kosnik wrote:
> >
> > Why do we have a libstdc++ list? For questions like this...
> >
> Because this is a flaw in the libstdc++-v3 testsuite harness
> which obviously the core gcc testsuite handles properly. The
> other gcc developers might have an insight on the best way
> to fix this for libstdc++-v3 (since it appears you need some
> of the procs from gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp).
Actually it's a flaw in my new tests, a missing space in
// { dg-require-effective-target dfp }
Patch will be checked in momentarily; sorry about that.
By the way, gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports-dg.exp is
included indirectly, and the check doesn't look for any
specific error message.
Janis