This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Anyone for slush?

From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>
To: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at adacore dot com>
Cc: Joel Sherrill <joel dot sherrill at oarcorp dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, Dave Korn <dave dot korn dot cygwin at googlemail dot com>, NightStrike <nightstrike at gmail dot com>
Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 08:04:23 -0700
Subject: Re: Anyone for slush?
References: <4AB4A9A8.7060805@gmail.com> <4AB4E14D.8080808@gmail.com> <4AB4EA34.7000807@oarcorp.com> <200909191658.56621.ebotcazou@adacore.com>

On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 7:58 AM, Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou@adacore.com> wrote:
>> I need to get run baseline test results on 4.3 and 4.4 for C and
>> C++. ?But the GNAT/RTEMS Ada results show a large number of
>> failures on the head that were not present in 4.3 and 4.4.
>>
>> SPARC and MIPS went from 2 to 319
>> x86 went from about 20 (mostly qemu issues) to 225
>
> OK, but the number of Ada failures is exactly 0 on x86/Linux, x86-64/Linux,
> ia64/Linux, SPARC/Solaris and SPARC64/Solaris and 1 on PowerPC64/Linux so
> you'll have to find out why it's so different for RTEMS.
>

It may be:

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41395


-- 
H.J.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Anyone for slush?
  - From: Kai Tietz

References:
- Anyone for slush?
  - From: Dave Korn
- Re: Anyone for slush?
  - From: Dave Korn
- Re: Anyone for slush?
  - From: Joel Sherrill
- Re: Anyone for slush?
  - From: Eric Botcazou

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]