This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [lto] Reader-writer compatibility?

From: fche at redhat dot com (Frank Ch. Eigler)
To: rmansfield at qnx dot com
Cc: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at google dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2009 14:32:31 -0400
Subject: Re: [lto] Reader-writer compatibility?
References: <4A9D40C8.7080000@qnx.com> <b798aad50909010843n574c5f9co402679dbe92e1f13@mail.gmail.com> <4A9D5DB0.5040602@qnx.com>

Ryan Mansfield <rmansfield@qnx.com> writes:

> The objects were created with rev 151111 and being read using 151271.
> No, I can't reproduce the ICE using the same version.
> Thanks for confirming this is not expected to work.

Is it the intent that this work properly in the future?  It is not
absurd to imagine that someone with a treeful of .o files might suffer
an unexpected compiler upgrade before a later reuse/relink attempt.

- FChE

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [lto] Reader-writer compatibility?
  - From: Diego Novillo

References:
- [lto] Reader-writer compatibility?
  - From: Ryan Mansfield
- Re: [lto] Reader-writer compatibility?
  - From: Diego Novillo
- Re: [lto] Reader-writer compatibility?
  - From: Ryan Mansfield

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]