This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Preparing to merge ARM/hard_vfp_branch to trunk
- From: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha at arm dot com>
- To: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Cc: Kazu Hirata <kazu at codesourcery dot com>, rth at redhat dot com, davem at redhat dot com, jakub at redhat dot com, ebotcazou at libertysurf dot fr
- Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2009 15:31:45 +0100
- Subject: Re: Preparing to merge ARM/hard_vfp_branch to trunk
- References: <1249478458.17762.33.camel@e200601-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 14:20 +0100, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
> I think we are now in the position where we can merge the arm hard-vfp
> ABI code into trunk. There are no known issues with the compiler code
> and just one outstanding issue relating to tests and dealing with
> compiler variants (multilibs and other options). That issue shouldn't
> prevent merging.
>
> All the patches to non-arm code bar one have already received approval
> for mainline integration. The outstanding issue is a change to the
> SPARC back-end to account for a change to the LIBCALL_VALUE macro.
>
> I believe that I could legitimately approve that patch myself (it's
> pretty trivial and I didn't author it), but I'd prefer to get approval
> from one of the SPARC maintainers. Here's your chance:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-04/msg01027.html
>
> Once that issue is taken care of, I don't think there are any further
> obstacles to completing the merge and propose to do that sometime over
> the next week.
>
> Comments/objections please?
>
> R.
I've now completed the merge. A couple of late issues that Joseph has
just reminded me of will now be fixed on the trunk.
R.