This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: MELT tutorial on the wiki
- From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
- To: Dave Korn <dave dot korn dot cygwin at googlemail dot com>
- Cc: Basile STARYNKEVITCH <basile at starynkevitch dot net>, GCC Mailing List <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2009 10:11:44 -0600
- Subject: Re: MELT tutorial on the wiki
- References: <4A707003.8060103@starynkevitch.net> <m3k51prhv4.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <4A728EE2.2050401@starynkevitch.net> <m3eirwpwoq.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <4A73E386.3080508@gmail.com> <4A73E407.8030407@starynkevitch.net> <4A73EA9A.6050701@gmail.com>
- Reply-to: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
>>>>> "Dave" == Dave Korn <dave.korn.cygwin@googlemail.com> writes:
Dave> Were you using a --prefix? The PPL checks (by design I think) only
Dave> look for PPL in your prefix.
Dave> I do not know it; I have merely observed the behaviour. It may
Dave> even not be by design for all I know, though I suspect it makes
Dave> sense - where else would you look but in the prefix? Prefixes
Dave> exist to create separation between packages.
That didn't seem to be what the code on Basile's branch does.
But, if this is what the PPL checks do actually do somewhere, then they
are broken. Prefix is for specifying the install tree -- specifying how
the build is done is handled by other options.
Tom