This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: GCC and boehm-gc

From: NightStrike <nightstrike at gmail dot com>
To: Hans Boehm <Hans dot Boehm at hp dot com>
Cc: David Daney <ddaney at caviumnetworks dot com>, "gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 17:40:57 -0400
Subject: Re: GCC and boehm-gc
References: <b609cb3b0906180910n48417dbbkf31e014b30c38daf@mail.gmail.com> <4A3A6AD8.70207@caviumnetworks.com> <b609cb3b0906180945o43b3259ata235effb8ac61b61@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.LNX.1.10.0906181412520.1363@192.168.2.2>

On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 5:25 PM, Hans Boehm<Hans.Boehm@hp.com> wrote:
> What has been a problem is that while the 6.8 -> 7.0 changes cleaned
> up the code substantially, and a lot of contributed patches since then
> have done a lot more of that, that step also introduced a fair amount of
> instability. ?I think we're largely over that now. ?But 7.1 is fairly old,
> so the merge would either have to use the CVS trunk or wait for 7.2 (which
> I'm trying to find time to get out real soon now).

Can you bring gcc up to speed with cvs HEAD?

References:
- GCC and boehm-gc
  - From: NightStrike
- Re: GCC and boehm-gc
  - From: David Daney
- Re: GCC and boehm-gc
  - From: NightStrike
- Re: GCC and boehm-gc
  - From: Hans Boehm

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]