This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: AVR C++ - how to move vtables into FLASH memory

From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant at google dot com>
To: ZoltÃn KÃcsi <zoltan at bendor dot com dot au>
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 17:24:38 -0700
Subject: Re: AVR C++ - how to move vtables into FLASH memory
References: <4A376AFD.5020107@mp.pl> <m3eitk44yf.fsf@google.com> <20090617074954.40a18e79@manocska.bendor.com.au>

ZoltÃn KÃcsi <zoltan@bendor.com.au> writes:

> So it is indeed a valid compiler issue, not an incompetent user issue.
> Probably an improvement request would be the best.

Thanks for the details on the AVR.

The question of gcc vs. gcc-help is not one of compiler issues
vs. incompetent user issues.  Many highly competent users post on
gcc-help.  The question is one of using gcc vs. modifying gcc.  A
discussion of how to modify gcc's AVR backend to support putting the
virtual table in FLASH would be appropriate for gcc@.  A message like
yours is appropriate for gcc-help@.  Thanks.

Ian

References:
- AVR C++ - how to move vtables into FLASH memory
  - From: Tomasz Francuz
- Re: AVR C++ - how to move vtables into FLASH memory
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: AVR C++ - how to move vtables into FLASH memory
  - From: ZoltÃn KÃcsi

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]