This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: What is -3.I (as opposed to 0-3.I) supposed evaluate to?
On Mon, 8 Jun 2009, Kaveh R. Ghazi wrote:
> Perhaps the only safe way to create the value, even in the presence of
> rounding mode changes, is to use conj(3.I) ?
Setting the __real__ and __imag__ parts of a temporary variable should
always be reliable for making a complex number out of arbitrary real and
imaginary parts.
--
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com