This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: gcc 4.4.0 on Solaris 10 Sparc, some tests failed.
- From: Amitava Dutta <ad_101 at yahoo dot com>
- To: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at adacore dot com>
- Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, "Kaveh R. GHAZI" <ghazi at caip dot rutgers dot edu>
- Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 15:23:12 -0700 (PDT)
- Subject: Re: gcc 4.4.0 on Solaris 10 Sparc, some tests failed.
- Reply-to: ad_101 at yahoo dot com
Rebuilt using GNU as and ld and the number
of libgomp failure came down to 18 from 80:
=== gcc Summary ===
# of expected passes 50313
# of unexpected failures 14
# of unexpected successes 3
# of expected failures 231
# of unsupported tests 651
=== g++ Summary ===
# of expected passes 19043
# of unexpected failures 1
# of unexpected successes 2
# of expected failures 143
# of unsupported tests 173
=== gfortran Summary ===
# of expected passes 29193
# of expected failures 12
# of unsupported tests 135
=== libstdc++ Summary ===
# of expected passes 5750
# of unexpected successes 2
# of expected failures 80
# of unsupported tests 385
=== libgomp Summary ===
# of expected passes 2370
# of unexpected failures 18
# of unsupported tests 9
I'll submit the full report soon.
Thanks for your help.
Best regards
Amitava Dutta
--- On Mon, 5/18/09, Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou@adacore.com> wrote:
> From: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou@adacore.com>
> Subject: Re: gcc 4.4.0 on Solaris 10 Sparc, some tests failed.
> To: ad_101@yahoo.com
> Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, "Kaveh R. GHAZI" <ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu>
> Date: Monday, May 18, 2009, 1:37 AM
> > Ran the "make -k check" without
> the -j option,
> > after creating a symlink to /usr/local/bin/stty
> > (noticed many errors about that)
> >
> > Is this as good a build as I can expect?
>
> Probably, although the number of libgomp failures is
> high.? You might want to
> try with the GNU assembler instead of the Sun assembler,
> the latter is barely
> maintained by Sun.
>
> --
> Eric Botcazou
>