This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: naked zero_extracts longer than a word.
- From: Toon Moene <toon at moene dot org>
- To: Ian Lance Taylor <iant at google dot com>
- Cc: Kenneth Zadeck <zadeck at naturalbridge dot com>, gcc <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>, rdsandiford at googlemail dot com, law at redhat dot com, "Bonzini\, Paolo" <bonzini at gnu dot org>, wilson at codesourcery dot com
- Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 21:17:03 +0200
- Subject: Re: naked zero_extracts longer than a word.
- References: <4A083BC9.email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
I guess the obvious counterexample would be a processor which supported
vector registers and supported bitfield operations on such registers. I
don't know of any such processors.
The Control Data Cyber 205 (roughly '75-'85).
You could write the inner loop of the Sieve of Eratosthenes as a single
We do not have a (supported) port for that architecture.
Toon Moene - e-mail: email@example.com - phone: +31 346 214290
Saturnushof 14, 3738 XG Maartensdijk, The Netherlands
At home: http://moene.org/~toon/
Progress of GNU Fortran: http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.4/changes.html