gcc archive
author index for May, 2009

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav:	[Browse other archives for this mailing list] [Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to: This time period only This mailing list only All mailing lists Entire site (no limit)

Christian Schüler

• 2009-05-17 13:22 successful 4.4.0 bootstrap

Manuel López-Ibáñez

• 2009-05-01 12:53 Re: [RFC] Thoughts on reordering the source tree
• 2009-05-05 12:01 C_MAYBE_CONST_EXPR, PR16302, Wlogical-op and make_range/merge_ranges
• 2009-05-06 17:28 Re: archives broken?
• 2009-05-19 08:13 Re: new warnings building cp-demangle.c
• 2009-05-20 14:39 Re: [RFC] enabling -fshow-column by default
• 2009-05-20 15:03 Re: [RFC] enabling -fshow-column by default
• 2009-05-27 16:30 Re: plugins & howto & generators

Josà Manuel AndiÃn FernÃndez

• 2009-05-22 16:59 XARK Backend with OpenMP

Abhishek Shrivastav

• 2009-05-25 18:53 Inner loop unable to compute sufficient information during vectorization
• 2009-05-31 13:44 Re: Inner loop unable to compute sufficient information during vectorization

Adam Nemet

• 2009-05-28 18:11 Re: Forgetting return values
• 2009-05-28 18:23 Re: Forgetting return values

Albert Cohen

• 2009-05-09 20:07 Interest in integer auto-upcasting pass for normalization and optimization?
• 2009-05-10 22:51 Re: Interest in integer auto-upcasting pass for normalization and optimization?

Aldy Hernandez

• 2009-05-20 14:22 [RFC] enabling -fshow-column by default
• 2009-05-20 15:38 Re: [RFC] enabling -fshow-column by default

Alessio Igor Bogani

• 2009-05-10 14:57 Request about adding a new micro support

Alex

• 2009-05-17 12:30 m68k: testing shift result

Alex Turjan

• 2009-05-06 08:22 Re: Fwd: gcc instruction scheduling makes things worse?
• 2009-05-06 12:27 scheduling question
• 2009-05-07 12:56 Re: scheduling question

Alexey Chupahin

• 2009-05-20 17:05 alphapca56-unknown-linux-gnu built

Alison Boeckmann

• 2009-05-21 12:50 Re: Object file for Module is too large

Amitava Dutta

• 2009-05-14 16:03 Build of gcc 4.4.0 on Solaris 10 Sparc ok, most tests failed.
• 2009-05-15 18:16 Re: Build of gcc 4.4.0 on Solaris 10 Sparc ok, most tests failed.
• 2009-05-18 04:11 gcc 4.4.0 on Solaris 10 Sparc, some tests failed.
• 2009-05-18 12:21 Re: gcc 4.4.0 on Solaris 10 Sparc, some tests failed.
• 2009-05-19 22:23 Re: gcc 4.4.0 on Solaris 10 Sparc, some tests failed.

Amker.Cheng

• 2009-05-11 10:18 Help: does define_peephole still work in gcc-4.2.4
• 2009-05-11 12:05 Re: Help: does define_peephole still work in gcc-4.2.4

Andi Kleen

• 2009-05-05 08:49 Re: [Announcement] Creating lightweight IPO branch
• 2009-05-05 17:33 Re: [Announcement] Creating lightweight IPO branch
• 2009-05-13 07:33 Re: New GCC releases comparison and comparison of GCC4.4 and LLVM2.5 on SPEC2000
• 2009-05-13 11:35 Re: New GCC releases comparison and comparison of GCC4.4 and LLVM2.5 on SPEC2000

Andreas Schwab

• 2009-05-06 14:33 Re: Bootstrap broken by ppl/cloog config problem: finds non-system/non-standard "/include" dir
• 2009-05-07 09:46 Mainline bootstrap broken
• 2009-05-12 19:31 Re: Graphite build fails if PPL configured with --disable-shared
• 2009-05-12 19:49 Re: Graphite build fails if PPL configured with --disable-shared
• 2009-05-17 18:20 Re: m68k: testing shift result
• 2009-05-18 13:21 Re: Fortran bootstrap broken
• 2009-05-21 11:50 Re: -Wcast-qual and casting away
• 2009-05-21 12:09 Re: -Wcast-qual and casting away

Andrew Haley

• 2009-05-01 19:54 Re: [RFC] Thoughts on reordering the source tree
• 2009-05-06 16:39 Re: [JAVA,libtool] Big libjava is biiiig.
• 2009-05-06 16:40 Re: [JAVA,libtool] Big libjava is biiiig.
• 2009-05-06 17:12 Re: [JAVA,libtool] Big libjava is biiiig.
• 2009-05-06 17:34 Re: archives broken?
• 2009-05-07 09:49 Re: An optimization question
• 2009-05-07 13:05 Re: An optimization question
• 2009-05-08 11:00 Re: An optimization question
• 2009-05-08 12:45 Re: An optimization question
• 2009-05-11 17:26 Re: [JAVA,libtool] Big libjava is biiiig.
• 2009-05-11 17:39 Re: [JAVA,libtool] Big libjava is biiiig.
• 2009-05-13 16:18 Re: [JAVA,libtool] Big libjava is biiiig.
• 2009-05-19 12:45 Re: Type-punning warnings [was Re: PATCH: silence warnings in unwind-dw2-fde.c]
• 2009-05-24 09:26 Re: What does zero-length array mean at file scope?
• 2009-05-24 10:34 Re: What does zero-length array mean at file scope?
• 2009-05-24 13:05 Re: What does zero-length array mean at file scope?
• 2009-05-29 09:04 Re: What does zero-length array mean at file scope?

Andrew Pinski

• 2009-05-03 23:21 Re: Empty loops removal (Was Re: Some extra decorations)
• 2009-05-06 06:11 Re: opaque vector types?
• 2009-05-08 01:00 Re: [RFC] Thoughts on reordering the source tree
• 2009-05-08 01:02 Re: [RFC] Thoughts on reordering the source tree
• 2009-05-11 20:11 Re: Graphite build fails if PPL configured with --disable-shared
• 2009-05-11 20:13 Re: Graphite build fails if PPL configured with --disable-shared
• 2009-05-11 23:48 Re: Extending constraints using register subclasses
• 2009-05-16 15:05 Re: Extending constraints using register subclasses
• 2009-05-19 00:38 Re: new warnings building cp-demangle.c
• 2009-05-19 18:30 Re: REC: gimplify - create a temp that is set at outermost block?
• 2009-05-19 19:10 Re: REC: gimplify - create a temp that is set at outermost block?
• 2009-05-21 15:22 Re: nops
• 2009-05-28 05:16 Re: c++ template conformance: gcc vs MS
• 2009-05-28 23:05 Re: std::exception_ptr on Cygwin

Angelo Graziosi

• 2009-05-08 16:55 [Fwd: Failure in bootstrapping gfortran-4.5 on Cygwin]

Anthony Green

• 2009-05-02 14:24 Problems with in-tree host libraries (gmp, ppl, etc)

Arnaud Charlet

• 2009-05-07 10:01 Re: Mainline bootstrap broken

Arthur Schwarz

• 2009-05-12 04:02 cout Issue

Basile STARYNKEVITCH

• 2009-05-05 06:09 Re: Plugins & GGC ie GTY
• 2009-05-10 06:44 MELT tutorial on the wiki
• 2009-05-12 08:33 plugins callbacks and data
• 2009-05-22 07:16 Re: Adding new runtime library
• 2009-05-27 15:30 plugins & howto & generators

Ben Elliston

• 2009-05-10 21:58 Re: Request about adding a new micro support
• 2009-05-19 00:28 new warnings building cp-demangle.c
• 2009-05-19 00:53 Re: new warnings building cp-demangle.c
• 2009-05-19 13:18 Re: Type-punning warnings [was Re: PATCH: silence warnings in unwind-dw2-fde.c]
• 2009-05-25 12:42 Re: Do we have optimizations to reduce cache miss?

Benoit Pradelle

• 2009-05-19 12:23 OpenMP performance loss

Bernd Schmidt

• 2009-05-15 10:55 Re: Interest in integer auto-upcasting pass for normalization and optimization?
• 2009-05-22 14:56 Re: [4.5] Find more autoinc addressing for induction variables

Bingfeng Mei

• 2009-05-01 09:05 Reload problem: asm operand requires impossible reload
• 2009-05-01 14:42 RE: Reload problem: asm operand requires impossible reload
• 2009-05-18 10:37 RE: Reload problem: asm operand requires impossible reload

Brad Hards

• 2009-05-08 08:03 Finding gcc plugin headers
• 2009-05-08 23:04 Re: Finding gcc plugin headers
• 2009-05-09 07:59 Re: Finding gcc plugin headers
• 2009-05-09 22:28 Re: Finding gcc plugin headers
• 2009-05-10 12:02 Re: add new optimization pass to the GCC optimizations
• 2009-05-24 11:38 problem with getting statements (DECL_SAVED_TREE?)
• 2009-05-24 12:29 Re: problem with getting statements (DECL_SAVED_TREE?)

Bradley Lucier

• 2009-05-29 19:57 Measuring FSF gcc from 4.1.2 to today on various benchmarks.

Bruce Korb

• 2009-05-20 22:10 Re: fixincludes & sed question

charfi asma

• 2009-05-10 11:39 add new optimization pass to the GCC optimizations

chenyang

• 2009-05-20 07:46 GCC4.3.3: Bootstrap comparison failure!
• 2009-05-21 09:16 Re: GCC4.3.3: Bootstrap comparison failure!
• 2009-05-22 09:07 Re: GCC4.3.3: Bootstrap comparison failure!

Chris Lattner

• 2009-05-12 17:45 Re: New GCC releases comparison and comparison of GCC4.4 and LLVM2.5 on SPEC2000
• 2009-05-12 18:42 Re: New GCC releases comparison and comparison of GCC4.4 and LLVM2.5 on SPEC2000
• 2009-05-25 19:53 Re: New GCC releases comparison and comparison of GCC4.4 and LLVM2.5 on SPEC2000

Christian Joensson

• 2009-05-05 09:28 [gcc trunk on cygwin] ../../gcc/gcc/config/i386/msformat-c.c:[39,40,41,42,43,44,58,75,87,110,128,145] error: enum conversion in initialization is invalid in C++
• 2009-05-05 09:46 Re: [gcc trunk on cygwin] ../../gcc/gcc/config/i386/msformat-c.c:[39,40,41,42,43,44,58,75,87,110,128,145] error: enum conversion in initialization is invalid in C++

Daniel Berlin

• 2009-05-19 00:02 Re: optimization question
• 2009-05-28 06:12 Re: c++ template conformance: gcc vs MS

Daniel Jacobowitz

• 2009-05-10 23:34 Re: Interest in integer auto-upcasting pass for normalization and optimization?
• 2009-05-11 19:54 Re: naked zero_extracts longer than a word.

daniel tian

• 2009-05-13 09:56 internal compiler error: in reload_combine_note_use, at postreload.c:1093
• 2009-05-14 03:54 Re: internal compiler error: in reload_combine_note_use, at postreload.c:1093

Dave Korn

• 2009-05-04 12:23 Re: [gnat] reuse of ASTs already constructed
• 2009-05-05 09:40 Re: [gcc trunk on cygwin] ../../gcc/gcc/config/i386/msformat-c.c:[39,40,41,42,43,44,58,75,87,110,128,145] error: enum conversion in initialization is invalid in C++
• 2009-05-06 13:39 Bootstrap broken by ppl/cloog config problem: finds non-system/non-standard "/include" dir
• 2009-05-06 14:53 Re: Bootstrap broken by ppl/cloog config problem: finds non-system/non-standard "/include" dir
• 2009-05-06 15:00 Re: Bootstrap broken by ppl/cloog config problem: finds non-system/non-standard "/include" dir
• 2009-05-06 15:14 What precisely is the status of ppl/cloog anyway?
• 2009-05-06 15:55 [JAVA,libtool] Big libjava is biiiig.
• 2009-05-06 15:58 Re: [JAVA,libtool] Big libjava is biiiig.
• 2009-05-06 15:59 Re: Bootstrap broken by ppl/cloog config problem: finds non-system/non-standard "/include" dir
• 2009-05-06 16:03 Re: What precisely is the status of ppl/cloog anyway?
• 2009-05-06 16:45 Re: [JAVA,libtool] Big libjava is biiiig.
• 2009-05-06 16:57 Re: [JAVA,libtool] Big libjava is biiiig.
• 2009-05-06 17:08 Re: [JAVA,libtool] Big libjava is biiiig.
• 2009-05-06 17:22 [PATCH] Fix bootstrap when no --with-ppl/--with-cloog [was Re: What precisely is the status of ppl/cloog anyway?]
• 2009-05-06 17:26 Re: archives broken?
• 2009-05-06 22:06 Re: archives broken?
• 2009-05-06 22:34 Re: archives broken?
• 2009-05-06 22:53 Re: archives broken?
• 2009-05-07 11:45 Re: Intermediate representation and egcs 1.1
• 2009-05-07 11:49 Re: An optimization question
• 2009-05-07 19:48 C++ typeinfo and vtables vs. DECL_CONTEXT.
• 2009-05-07 20:08 Re: C++ typeinfo and vtables vs. DECL_CONTEXT.
• 2009-05-08 12:23 Re: An optimization question
• 2009-05-08 12:26 Re: Finding gcc plugin headers
• 2009-05-08 14:31 Re: [C++] Inheritance chain enumeration
• 2009-05-09 15:26 Re: Finding gcc plugin headers
• 2009-05-09 15:37 Re: [Fwd: Failure in bootstrapping gfortran-4.5 on Cygwin]
• 2009-05-11 17:14 Re: [JAVA,libtool] Big libjava is biiiig.
• 2009-05-11 17:33 Re: [JAVA,libtool] Big libjava is biiiig.
• 2009-05-11 18:03 Re: [JAVA,libtool] Big libjava is biiiig.
• 2009-05-12 13:13 Re: Intermediate representation
• 2009-05-13 11:29 Re: Using MPC Library with GCC
• 2009-05-13 11:32 Re: internal compiler error: in reload_combine_note_use, at postreload.c:1093
• 2009-05-13 12:07 Re: New GCC releases comparison and comparison of GCC4.4 and LLVM2.5 on SPEC2000
• 2009-05-13 12:38 Re: [JAVA,libtool] Big libjava is biiiig.
• 2009-05-13 15:39 Re: [JAVA,libtool] Big libjava is biiiig.
• 2009-05-13 17:59 Re: [JAVA,libtool] Big libjava is biiiig.
• 2009-05-18 13:16 Re: Intermediate representation and informations
• 2009-05-19 12:28 Type-punning warnings [was Re: PATCH: silence warnings in unwind-dw2-fde.c]
• 2009-05-19 13:00 Re: Type-punning warnings [was Re: PATCH: silence warnings in unwind-dw2-fde.c]
• 2009-05-19 13:48 Re: Type-punning warnings [was Re: PATCH: silence warnings in unwind-dw2-fde.c]
• 2009-05-19 16:52 Parallel make: does everyone get this error right at the start?
• 2009-05-19 17:10 Re: Parallel make: does everyone get this error right at the start?
• 2009-05-21 12:38 Re: -Wcast-qual and casting away
• 2009-05-23 14:17 Re: [RFA] Fix documentation of snprintf and vsnprintf
• 2009-05-24 00:47 What does zero-length array mean at file scope?
• 2009-05-24 01:17 Re: What does zero-length array mean at file scope?
• 2009-05-24 02:18 Re: What does zero-length array mean at file scope?
• 2009-05-24 09:47 Re: What does zero-length array mean at file scope?
• 2009-05-24 09:55 Re: a strange make error
• 2009-05-24 10:57 Re: What does zero-length array mean at file scope?
• 2009-05-24 11:18 Re: What does zero-length array mean at file scope?
• 2009-05-24 13:25 Re: What does zero-length array mean at file scope?
• 2009-05-25 12:03 Re: relative include search path
• 2009-05-26 15:41 Re: Intermediate representation
• 2009-05-27 17:58 Re: plugins & howto & generators
• 2009-05-28 22:48 Re: What does zero-length array mean at file scope?
• 2009-05-28 23:04 Re: What does zero-length array mean at file scope?
• 2009-05-29 00:37 Re: std::exception_ptr on Cygwin
• 2009-05-29 14:16 [OT] Re: MinGW toolchain build failure for M16CM32C
• 2009-05-29 14:23 Re: Problems with sibling calls
• 2009-05-29 16:26 Re: Problems with sibling calls
• 2009-05-29 16:29 Re: Problems with sibling calls
• 2009-05-29 16:57 Re: RFC: Option handling and PR 37565
• 2009-05-30 17:07 [fortran] Different FUNC_DECLS with the same DECL_NAME - MAIN__ and named PROGRAM main functions [was Re: gcc-4.5-20090528 is now available]
• 2009-05-30 18:07 Re: [fortran] Different FUNC_DECLS with the same DECL_NAME - MAIN__ and named PROGRAM main functions [was Re: gcc-4.5-20090528 is now available]
• 2009-05-30 18:26 Re: [fortran] Different FUNC_DECLS with the same DECL_NAME - MAIN__ and named PROGRAM main functions [was Re: gcc-4.5-20090528 is now available]
• 2009-05-30 18:42 Re: [fortran] Different FUNC_DECLS with the same DECL_NAME - MAIN__ and named PROGRAM main functions [was Re: gcc-4.5-20090528 is now available]
• 2009-05-30 21:11 Re: [fortran] Different FUNC_DECLS with the same DECL_NAME - MAIN__ and named PROGRAM main functions [was Re: gcc-4.5-20090528 is now available]
• 2009-05-31 13:32 Re: [fortran] Different FUNC_DECLS with the same DECL_NAME - MAIN__ and named PROGRAM main functions [was Re: gcc-4.5-20090528 is now available]

David Daney

• 2009-05-06 16:27 Re: [JAVA,libtool] Big libjava is biiiig.

Denis Onischenko

• 2009-05-25 11:13 relative include search path

Diego Novillo

• 2009-05-12 12:02 Re: [plugins] Name for pass_all_optimizations
• 2009-05-15 21:40 Re: 4.4 API changes
• 2009-05-15 21:44 Re: Writing over [SP]
• 2009-05-15 21:45 Re: a mistake in gccint doc
• 2009-05-16 14:45 [lto] Enabling LTO in selected testsuite directories
• 2009-05-18 01:47 Re: [lto] Enabling LTO in selected testsuite directories
• 2009-05-19 11:13 Re: [lto] LDFLAGS get lost in stage2
• 2009-05-19 14:31 Re: [lto] Enabling LTO in selected testsuite directories
• 2009-05-19 14:33 Re: [lto] Enabling LTO in selected testsuite directories
• 2009-05-19 15:25 Re: [lto] LDFLAGS get lost in stage2

DJ Delorie

• 2009-05-05 02:03 Re: CONSTRAINT__LIMIT
• 2009-05-06 06:04 opaque vector types?
• 2009-05-06 06:29 Re: opaque vector types?
• 2009-05-20 19:51 Re: bitfields: types vs modes?
• 2009-05-20 21:35 Re: bitfields: types vs modes?

Duncan Sands

• 2009-05-13 11:51 Re: New GCC releases comparison and comparison of GCC4.4 and LLVM2.5 on SPEC2000
• 2009-05-13 12:27 Re: New GCC releases comparison and comparison of GCC4.4 and LLVM2.5 on SPEC2000

eCos

• 2009-05-07 08:53 An optimization question

Eli Zaretskii

• 2009-05-23 13:41 [RFA] Fix documentation of snprintf and vsnprintf

Eric Botcazou

• 2009-05-01 21:13 Re: Reserving a number of consecutive registers
• 2009-05-06 17:35 Re: Setting ARM PIC register (Was: RE: GCC 4.5.0 Status Report (2009-05-05))
• 2009-05-06 19:01 Re: [RFC] Get rid of awkward semantics for subtypes
• 2009-05-06 21:59 Re: [RFC] Get rid of awkward semantics for subtypes
• 2009-05-14 16:10 Re: Build of gcc 4.4.0 on Solaris 10 Sparc ok, most tests failed.
• 2009-05-15 18:39 Re: Build of gcc 4.4.0 on Solaris 10 Sparc ok, most tests failed.
• 2009-05-15 21:15 Re: Build of gcc 4.4.0 on Solaris 10 Sparc ok, most tests failed.
• 2009-05-16 06:42 Re: 4.4 API changes
• 2009-05-18 05:32 Re: gcc 4.4.0 on Solaris 10 Sparc, some tests failed.
• 2009-05-22 19:05 Re: false assertion make_decl_rtl, at varasm.c:1273
• 2009-05-27 17:31 Re: Seeking suggestion

Eric Christopher

• 2009-05-11 17:38 Re: Please Send me info on GCC for iPhone 3.0 plus see below

Eric Fisher

• 2009-05-15 06:12 a mistake in gccint doc
• 2009-05-16 03:43 Re: a mistake in gccint doc
• 2009-05-19 06:29 [lto] LDFLAGS get lost in stage2
• 2009-05-25 07:54 Do we have optimizations to reduce cache miss?

Eus

• 2009-05-01 02:04 Re: (extern int vs. int) and (extern function vs. function) (was: gcc-in-cxx update)
• 2009-05-01 02:07 Re: (extern int vs. int) and (extern function vs. function) (was: gcc-in-cxx update)

Evan Cheng

• 2009-05-13 18:11 Re: New GCC releases comparison and comparison of GCC4.4 and LLVM2.5 on SPEC2000

Fengzhe Zhang

• 2009-05-12 08:31 incomplete tree dump with flag -fdump-tree-all

FX

• 2009-05-12 12:03 Re: Object file for Module is too large
• 2009-05-13 08:44 Re: Using MPC Library with GCC
• 2009-05-20 21:34 Re: Object file for Module is too large

Gabriel Dos Reis

• 2009-05-01 05:52 Re: gcc-in-cxx update
• 2009-05-01 05:53 Re: gcc-in-cxx update
• 2009-05-01 05:56 Re: gcc-in-cxx update
• 2009-05-01 05:58 Re: gcc-in-cxx update
• 2009-05-01 06:02 Re: (extern int vs. int) and (extern function vs. function) (was: gcc-in-cxx update)
• 2009-05-21 17:29 Re: -Wcast-qual and casting away
• 2009-05-21 17:31 Re: -Wcast-qual and casting away
• 2009-05-21 17:36 Re: -Wcast-qual and casting away
• 2009-05-25 16:39 Re: extern const (Was: Re: [gcc-in-cxx]: patches from multi-target-4_4-branch)
• 2009-05-25 16:40 Re: extern const (Was: Re: [gcc-in-cxx]: patches from multi-target-4_4-branch)

Gary Funck

• 2009-05-19 18:26 REC: gimplify - create a temp that is set at outermost block?
• 2009-05-19 19:04 Re: REC: gimplify - create a temp that is set at outermost block?
• 2009-05-19 22:47 Re: REC: gimplify - create a temp that is set at outermost block?
• 2009-05-20 00:34 grokdeclarator drops type qualifiers when -aux-info isn't asserted?
• 2009-05-20 18:01 Re: grokdeclarator drops type qualifiers when -aux-info isn't asserted?
• 2009-05-20 18:07 Re: REC: gimplify - create a temp that is set at outermost block?
• 2009-05-21 01:34 Re: REC: gimplify - create a temp that is set at outermost block?

gccadmin

• 2009-05-03 22:44 gcc-4.3-20090503 is now available
• 2009-05-05 22:46 gcc-4.4-20090505 is now available
• 2009-05-07 22:50 gcc-4.5-20090507 is now available
• 2009-05-10 22:45 gcc-4.3-20090510 is now available
• 2009-05-12 22:48 gcc-4.4-20090512 is now available
• 2009-05-14 22:55 gcc-4.5-20090514 is now available
• 2009-05-17 22:46 gcc-4.3-20090517 is now available
• 2009-05-19 22:45 gcc-4.4-20090519 is now available
• 2009-05-21 22:48 gcc-4.5-20090521 is now available
• 2009-05-24 22:51 gcc-4.3-20090524 is now available
• 2009-05-26 22:47 gcc-4.4-20090526 is now available
• 2009-05-28 22:45 gcc-4.5-20090528 is now available
• 2009-05-31 22:44 gcc-4.3-20090531 is now available

Georg-Johann Lay

• 2009-05-13 18:35 Re: Extending constraints using register subclasses
• 2009-05-13 20:06 Re: Extending constraints using register subclasses
• 2009-05-22 09:05 Re: Accumulator based machines
• 2009-05-23 07:05 Re: Seeking suggestion
• 2009-05-24 09:21 Re: Seeking suggestion
• 2009-05-27 19:11 Re: Seeking suggestion
• 2009-05-28 10:07 Re: Accessing called function attributes in FUNCTION_ARG macro
• 2009-05-29 09:23 Problems with sibling calls
• 2009-05-29 16:08 Re: Problems with sibling calls
• 2009-05-29 16:14 Re: Problems with sibling calls

Gerald Pfeifer

• 2009-05-16 20:09 Re: http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.4/changes.html
• 2009-05-18 12:34 Fortran bootstrap broken

H.J. Lu

• 2009-05-04 14:39 Re: Trunk freeze next Friday morning GMT for cond-optab merge
• 2009-05-11 20:13 Re: Graphite build fails if PPL configured with --disable-shared
• 2009-05-19 00:40 Re: new warnings building cp-demangle.c
• 2009-05-29 21:26 The Linux binutils 2.19.51.0.6 is release

He Xiao

• 2009-05-05 14:24 Fwd: gcc instruction scheduling makes things worse?

Ian Lance Taylor

• 2009-05-01 14:32 Re: Reload problem: asm operand requires impossible reload
• 2009-05-01 16:24 Re: Reload problem: asm operand requires impossible reload
• 2009-05-05 14:30 Re: -combine option for C++ sourcesâ
• 2009-05-06 19:20 Re: Issues with testsuite on constant pointer arithmetics
• 2009-05-06 19:25 Re: archives broken?
• 2009-05-06 20:24 Re: Issues with testsuite on constant pointer arithmetics
• 2009-05-06 22:43 Re: Issues with testsuite on constant pointer arithmetics
• 2009-05-07 00:01 Re: Avoiding REG+OFF memory accesses
• 2009-05-08 21:13 Re: [Fwd: Failure in bootstrapping gfortran-4.5 on Cygwin]
• 2009-05-11 16:30 Re: naked zero_extracts longer than a word.
• 2009-05-11 19:18 Trouble building Graphite
• 2009-05-11 19:26 Re: naked zero_extracts longer than a word.
• 2009-05-11 20:07 Graphite build fails if PPL configured with --disable-shared
• 2009-05-12 16:27 Re: incomplete tree dump with flag -fdump-tree-all
• 2009-05-12 17:54 Re: Graphite build fails if PPL configured with --disable-shared
• 2009-05-12 18:29 Re: Trouble building Graphite
• 2009-05-14 13:50 Re: Intermediate representation
• 2009-05-15 03:57 Re: Compact regsiter allocation
• 2009-05-15 04:07 Re: configure issue during make of avr-elf
• 2009-05-15 05:09 Re: Compact regsiter allocation
• 2009-05-15 17:15 Re: configure issue during make of avr-elf
• 2009-05-15 19:00 Re: configure issue during make of avr-elf
• 2009-05-15 19:34 Re: Compact regsiter allocation
• 2009-05-15 19:54 Re: Exception Handling description
• 2009-05-18 14:35 Re: Reload problem: asm operand requires impossible reload
• 2009-05-18 14:40 Re: Memory leak or incorrect use of '#pragma omp parallel'?
• 2009-05-18 14:52 Re: gcc 4.4.0 on Solaris 10 Sparc, some tests failed.
• 2009-05-19 01:26 Re: new warnings building cp-demangle.c
• 2009-05-20 14:13 Re: GCC4.3.3: Bootstrap comparison failure!
• 2009-05-20 14:19 Re: [jbaron@redhat.com: [PATCH 0/3] tracepoints: delay argument evaluation]
• 2009-05-20 14:45 Re: [RFC] enabling -fshow-column by default
• 2009-05-20 21:02 Re: bitfields: types vs modes?
• 2009-05-21 00:13 Re: REC: gimplify - create a temp that is set at outermost block?
• 2009-05-21 04:51 Re: nops
• 2009-05-21 04:52 Re: Issue on Solaris box
• 2009-05-21 05:11 -Wcast-qual and casting away
• 2009-05-21 15:42 Re: GCC4.3.3: Bootstrap comparison failure!
• 2009-05-21 15:47 Re: -Wcast-qual and casting away
• 2009-05-21 16:12 Re: -Wcast-qual and casting away
• 2009-05-22 18:04 Re: false assertion make_decl_rtl, at varasm.c:1273
• 2009-05-23 00:45 Re: Seeking suggestion
• 2009-05-25 01:50 Re: Limiting the use of pointer registers
• 2009-05-25 04:14 Re: extern const (Was: Re: [gcc-in-cxx]: patches from multi-target-4_4-branch)
• 2009-05-25 04:36 Re: extern const (Was: Re: [gcc-in-cxx]: patches from multi-target-4_4-branch)
• 2009-05-26 13:54 Re: March=native with a main 64bit system and 32bit chroot
• 2009-05-27 05:15 Re: 4.4: march-native gives -mno-sse4, but cpuinfo sse4_1
• 2009-05-27 14:42 Re: Variable Length Execution Set?
• 2009-05-27 15:19 Re: Variable Length Execution Set?
• 2009-05-28 16:42 Re: Is there a recursive debug_c_tree which decodes "variant tag"?
• 2009-05-29 14:54 Re: Problems with sibling calls
• 2009-05-29 16:38 Re: RFC: Option handling and PR 37565
• 2009-05-29 20:04 Re: RFC: Option handling and PR 37565
• 2009-05-30 00:58 Re: Problem with libpthread of uClibc

Iceman

• 2009-05-06 22:48 Avoiding REG+OFF memory accesses
• 2009-05-08 21:05 Re: Avoiding REG+OFF memory accesses
• 2009-05-08 23:11 Re: Avoiding REG+OFF memory accesses
• 2009-05-08 23:49 varargs target handling

Ira Rosen

• 2009-05-26 12:27 Re: Inner loop unable to compute sufficient information during vectorization

Jack Howarth

• 2009-05-06 13:08 Re: GCC 4.4.1 Status Report (2009-05-05)

Jakub Jelinek

• 2009-05-13 08:41 Re: New GCC releases comparison and comparison of GCC4.4 and LLVM2.5 on SPEC2000

Jamie Prescott

• 2009-05-09 20:20 Avoid subreg access patterns
• 2009-05-10 01:39 Re: Avoid subreg access patterns
• 2009-05-11 23:45 Extending constraints using register subclasses
• 2009-05-11 23:54 Re: Extending constraints using register subclasses
• 2009-05-12 06:59 Code generation problem with optimizations enabled
• 2009-05-12 08:09 Re: Code generation problem with optimizations enabled
• 2009-05-12 15:59 Re: Code generation problem with optimizations enabled
• 2009-05-12 17:23 Re: Code generation problem with optimizations enabled
• 2009-05-13 18:49 Re: Extending constraints using register subclasses
• 2009-05-14 01:30 Re: Code generation problem with optimizations enabled
• 2009-05-14 18:45 Re: Extending constraints using register subclasses
• 2009-05-14 22:18 Writing over [SP]
• 2009-05-14 23:22 Re: Extending constraints using register subclasses
• 2009-05-15 00:36 Re: Extending constraints using register subclasses
• 2009-05-15 03:05 Re: Extending constraints using register subclasses
• 2009-05-15 03:14 Compact regsiter allocation
• 2009-05-15 04:09 Re: Compact regsiter allocation
• 2009-05-15 05:15 Re: Compact regsiter allocation
• 2009-05-15 18:17 Re: Compact regsiter allocation
• 2009-05-15 21:23 4.4 API changes
• 2009-05-15 22:17 Re: Writing over [SP]
• 2009-05-15 22:19 Re: 4.4 API changes
• 2009-05-15 22:28 Different reload behavior from 4.3.3 to 4.4
• 2009-05-15 23:16 Re: Different reload behavior from 4.3.3 to 4.4
• 2009-05-16 00:55 Re: Different reload behavior from 4.3.3 to 4.4
• 2009-05-16 01:31 Re: Different reload behavior from 4.3.3 to 4.4
• 2009-05-16 14:57 Re: Extending constraints using register subclasses
• 2009-05-16 15:18 Re: Extending constraints using register subclasses
• 2009-05-21 01:53 nops
• 2009-05-21 15:13 Re: nops
• 2009-05-21 15:26 Re: nops
• 2009-05-22 17:37 Seeking suggestion
• 2009-05-23 00:04 Re: Seeking suggestion
• 2009-05-23 03:15 Re: Seeking suggestion
• 2009-05-23 17:09 Re: Seeking suggestion
• 2009-05-25 19:02 Re: Seeking suggestion
• 2009-05-27 17:12 Re: Seeking suggestion
• 2009-05-27 17:16 Re: Seeking suggestion
• 2009-05-27 18:56 Re: Seeking suggestion
• 2009-05-27 19:28 Re: Seeking suggestion
• 2009-05-28 17:48 Forgetting return values
• 2009-05-28 18:18 Re: Forgetting return values
• 2009-05-28 18:55 Re: Forgetting return values

Jan Hubicka

• 2009-05-01 20:01 Re: [RFC] Thoughts on reordering the source tree
• 2009-05-03 23:06 Empty loops removal (Was Re: Some extra decorations)
• 2009-05-03 23:19 Re: Empty loops removal (Was Re: Some extra decorations)
• 2009-05-13 15:42 Re: New GCC releases comparison and comparison of GCC4.4 and LLVM2.5 on SPEC2000

Janis Johnson

• 2009-05-11 20:14 Re: Graphite build fails if PPL configured with --disable-shared
• 2009-05-12 20:25 Re: Graphite build fails if PPL configured with --disable-shared
• 2009-05-18 17:17 Re: [lto] Enabling LTO in selected testsuite directories
• 2009-05-19 00:34 Re: new warnings building cp-demangle.c

Janne Blomqvist

• 2009-05-04 09:28 Re: gfortran-dev branch bootstrap breakage

Janus Weil

• 2009-05-18 13:45 Re: Fortran bootstrap broken
• 2009-05-18 13:59 Re: Fortran bootstrap broken

Jason Baron

• 2009-05-20 13:57 [jbaron@redhat.com: [PATCH 0/3] tracepoints: delay argument evaluation]

Jean Christophe Beyler

• 2009-05-01 20:33 Re: Reserving a number of consecutive registers
• 2009-05-01 20:41 Re: Reserving a number of consecutive registers
• 2009-05-07 19:56 Code optimization only in loops
• 2009-05-13 20:58 Re: Code optimization only in loops
• 2009-05-14 17:05 Re: internal compiler error: in reload_combine_note_use, at postreload.c:1093

Jerry DeLisle

• 2009-05-03 22:42 gfortran-dev branch bootstrap breakage

Jim Wilson

• 2009-05-04 17:30 Re: Unexpected offsets when eliminating SP
• 2009-05-06 02:02 Re: Fwd: gcc instruction scheduling makes things worse?
• 2009-05-11 16:54 Re: naked zero_extracts longer than a word.
• 2009-05-11 17:48 Re: varargs target handling
• 2009-05-14 01:22 Re: Code generation problem with optimizations enabled
• 2009-05-14 02:11 Re: Extending constraints using register subclasses
• 2009-05-17 16:33 Re: Destructive comparison
• 2009-05-18 15:33 Re: Destructive comparison
• 2009-05-22 01:01 Re: Accumulator based machines
• 2009-05-27 02:48 Re: Seeking suggestion

Joel Sherrill

• 2009-05-15 03:32 configure issue during make of avr-elf
• 2009-05-15 11:10 Re: configure issue during make of avr-elf

Joern Rennecke

• 2009-05-06 16:04 Setting ARM PIC register (Was: RE: GCC 4.5.0 Status Report (2009-05-05))
• 2009-05-11 09:21 Re: Interest in integer auto-upcasting pass for normalization and optimization?
• 2009-05-15 12:52 Re: Interest in integer auto-upcasting pass for normalization and optimization?
• 2009-05-25 03:23 extern const (Was: Re: [gcc-in-cxx]: patches from multi-target-4_4-branch)
• 2009-05-25 04:31 Re: extern const (Was: Re: [gcc-in-cxx]: patches from multi-target-4_4-branch)

Jonathan Wakely

• 2009-05-03 23:17 Re: Empty loops removal (Was Re: Some extra decorations)
• 2009-05-04 22:34 Re: Empty loops removal (Was Re: Some extra decorations)
• 2009-05-12 08:13 Re: cout Issue

Joseph S. Myers

• 2009-05-01 13:42 Re: [RFC] Thoughts on reordering the source tree
• 2009-05-01 13:54 Re: [RFC] Thoughts on reordering the source tree
• 2009-05-01 14:14 Re: [RFC] Thoughts on reordering the source tree
• 2009-05-01 16:49 Re: [RFC] Thoughts on reordering the source tree
• 2009-05-01 17:01 Re: [RFC] Thoughts on reordering the source tree
• 2009-05-01 21:11 Re: [RFC] Thoughts on reordering the source tree
• 2009-05-02 09:38 Re: [RFC] Thoughts on reordering the source tree
• 2009-05-02 15:36 Re: exception propagation support not enabled in libstdc++ 4.4 on {armeabi,hppa,sparc}-linux
• 2009-05-02 20:50 Re: exception propagation support not enabled in libstdc++ 4.4 on {armeabi,hppa,sparc}-linux
• 2009-05-03 23:20 Re: Empty loops removal (Was Re: Some extra decorations)
• 2009-05-05 11:12 Re: Re: -combine option for C++ sources‏
• 2009-05-06 19:21 Re: archives broken?
• 2009-05-06 22:25 Re: archives broken?
• 2009-05-06 22:48 Re: archives broken?
• 2009-05-12 18:05 Re: New GCC releases comparison and comparison of GCC4.4 and LLVM2.5 on SPEC2000
• 2009-05-13 12:23 Re: New GCC releases comparison and comparison of GCC4.4 and LLVM2.5 on SPEC2000
• 2009-05-18 17:07 Re: Fortran bootstrap broken
• 2009-05-19 15:18 Re: [lto] LDFLAGS get lost in stage2
• 2009-05-20 09:45 Re: grokdeclarator drops type qualifiers when -aux-info isn't asserted?
• 2009-05-20 15:04 Re: [RFC] enabling -fshow-column by default
• 2009-05-21 11:58 Re: -Wcast-qual and casting away
• 2009-05-28 20:59 Re: What does zero-length array mean at file scope?
• 2009-05-28 21:01 Re: What does zero-length array mean at file scope?
• 2009-05-28 21:05 Re: New GCC releases comparison and comparison of GCC4.4 and LLVM2.5 on SPEC2000
• 2009-05-28 21:06 Re: plugins & howto & generators
• 2009-05-29 16:56 Re: RFC: Option handling and PR 37565

josh . switnicki

• 2009-05-15 16:34 Re: configure issue during make of avr-elf
• 2009-05-15 18:05 Re: configure issue during make of avr-elf

Justin Seyster

• 2009-05-05 02:53 Re: Plugins & GGC ie GTY
• 2009-05-12 20:48 Re: [plugins] Name for pass_all_optimizations

Kai Tietz

• 2009-05-29 10:12 Re: MinGW toolchain build failure for M16CM32C
• 2009-05-29 10:17 Re: MinGW toolchain build failure for M16CM32C

Kaveh R. GHAZI

• 2009-05-03 07:01 Re: Problems with in-tree host libraries (gmp, ppl, etc)
• 2009-05-05 15:15 Re: Using MPC Library with GCC
• 2009-05-13 07:22 Re: Using MPC Library with GCC
• 2009-05-15 20:19 Re: Build of gcc 4.4.0 on Solaris 10 Sparc ok, most tests failed.
• 2009-05-30 03:46 Re: Using MPC Library with GCC

Kaz Kojima

• 2009-05-03 04:34 Re: [RFC] Thoughts on reordering the source tree
• 2009-05-08 03:41 Re: [RFC] Thoughts on reordering the source tree

Kenneth Zadeck

• 2009-05-11 14:53 naked zero_extracts longer than a word.

Kouadri Mostéfaoui Abdellah Medjadji

• 2009-05-22 15:07 false assertion make_decl_rtl, at varasm.c:1273

Larry Evans

• 2009-05-28 15:45 Is there a recursive debug_c_tree which decodes "variant tag"?
• 2009-05-28 19:10 Re: Is there a recursive debug_c_tree which decodes "variant tag"?

Laurent GUERBY

• 2009-05-12 07:42 Re: Graphite build fails if PPL configured with --disable-shared
• 2009-05-12 18:44 Re: Graphite build fails if PPL configured with --disable-shared
• 2009-05-12 19:41 Re: Graphite build fails if PPL configured with --disable-shared
• 2009-05-12 20:03 Re: Graphite build fails if PPL configured with --disable-shared

Luca Zorzo

• 2009-05-26 13:00 March=native with a main 64bit system and 32bit chroot

Mahesh Basavaraj Shavari

• 2009-05-29 10:07 MinGW toolchain build failure for M16CM32C

Mark George

• 2009-05-11 17:27 Please Send me info on GCC for iPhone 3.0 plus see below

Mark Mitchell

• 2009-05-03 20:39 Re: exception propagation support not enabled in libstdc++ 4.4 on {armeabi,hppa,sparc}-linux
• 2009-05-04 15:13 Re: Trunk freeze next Friday morning GMT for cond-optab merge
• 2009-05-04 22:45 Re: Problems with in-tree host libraries (gmp, ppl, etc)
• 2009-05-05 15:22 Re: Slush: Bug-Fixes Only for Middle End and Primary Platforms
• 2009-05-05 15:24 Re: Trunk freeze next Friday morning GMT for cond-optab merge
• 2009-05-05 16:25 GCC 4.5.0 Status Report (2009-05-05)
• 2009-05-05 17:04 Re: Using MPC Library with GCC
• 2009-05-06 04:36 GCC 4.4.1 Status Report (2009-05-05)
• 2009-05-06 15:10 Re: GCC 4.5.0 Status Report (2009-05-05)
• 2009-05-06 15:30 Re: GCC 4.4.1 Status Report (2009-05-05)
• 2009-05-06 16:11 Re: Setting ARM PIC register (Was: RE: GCC 4.5.0 Status Report (2009-05-05))
• 2009-05-07 14:27 Re: cond-optab merge delay? [was Re: GCC 4.5.0 Status Report (2009-05-05)]
• 2009-05-13 14:52 Re: Using MPC Library with GCC
• 2009-05-19 17:56 Re: [PATCH][RFC] Adjust the middle-end memory model
• 2009-05-19 22:57 Re: Multilib for ARM in thumb2 mode
• 2009-05-20 16:07 Re: [PATCH][RFC] Adjust the middle-end memory model
• 2009-05-20 21:08 Re: bitfields: types vs modes?
• 2009-05-21 02:39 Re: [PATCH][RFC] Adjust the middle-end memory model
• 2009-05-21 06:02 Re: bitfields: types vs modes?
• 2009-05-22 20:04 Re: [PATCH][RFC] Adjust the middle-end memory model

Mark Tall

• 2009-05-28 04:53 c++ template conformance: gcc vs MS
• 2009-05-28 04:56 Re: c++ template conformance: gcc vs MS
• 2009-05-28 05:33 Re: c++ template conformance: gcc vs MS

Matthias Klose

• 2009-05-02 11:05 exception propagation support not enabled in libstdc++ 4.4 on {armeabi,hppa,sparc}-linux
• 2009-05-05 08:48 Re: exception propagation support not enabled in libstdc++ 4.4 on {armeabi,hppa,sparc}-linux
• 2009-05-06 07:44 Re: exception propagation support not enabled in libstdc++ 4.4 on {armeabi,hppa,sparc}-linux
• 2009-05-07 10:17 Re: exception propagation support not enabled in libstdc++ 4.4 on {armeabi,hppa,sparc}-linux

Maxim Kuvyrkov

• 2009-05-07 10:01 Re: scheduling question

Michael Eager

• 2009-05-15 16:55 Exception Handling description
• 2009-05-15 19:57 Re: Exception Handling description
• 2009-05-17 18:28 Re: Exception Handling description
• 2009-05-17 22:20 Re: Exception Handling description
• 2009-05-18 15:26 Re: Exception Handling description

Michael Hope

• 2009-05-03 08:50 Re: Unexpected offsets when eliminating SP
• 2009-05-09 07:45 Re: Unexpected offsets when eliminating SP
• 2009-05-17 09:09 Destructive comparison
• 2009-05-18 07:58 Re: Destructive comparison
• 2009-05-18 19:02 Re: Destructive comparison
• 2009-05-22 00:16 Accumulator based machines
• 2009-05-24 10:23 Limiting the use of pointer registers

Michael Matz

• 2009-05-06 15:45 RE: GCC 4.5.0 Status Report (2009-05-05)
• 2009-05-06 15:56 RE: GCC 4.5.0 Status Report (2009-05-05)
• 2009-05-06 16:14 Re: Setting ARM PIC register (Was: RE: GCC 4.5.0 Status Report (2009-05-05))
• 2009-05-06 16:23 Re: Setting ARM PIC register (Was: RE: GCC 4.5.0 Status Report (2009-05-05))
• 2009-05-06 16:30 Re: Setting ARM PIC register (Was: RE: GCC 4.5.0 Status Report (2009-05-05))
• 2009-05-06 16:44 Re: Setting ARM PIC register (Was: RE: GCC 4.5.0 Status Report (2009-05-05))
• 2009-05-06 17:00 Re: Setting ARM PIC register (Was: RE: GCC 4.5.0 Status Report (2009-05-05))
• 2009-05-17 18:11 Re: Exception Handling description
• 2009-05-17 20:26 Re: Exception Handling description
• 2009-05-17 22:57 Re: Exception Handling description

Michael Meissner

• 2009-05-08 18:44 Re: opaque vector types?
• 2009-05-13 16:16 Re: New GCC releases comparison and comparison of GCC4.4 and LLVM2.5 on SPEC2000
• 2009-05-14 18:38 Re: Extending constraints using register subclasses
• 2009-05-14 23:25 Re: Extending constraints using register subclasses
• 2009-05-24 20:57 Re: Seeking suggestion
• 2009-05-25 02:00 Re: Limiting the use of pointer registers

Mikolaj Golub

• 2009-05-11 16:01 Memory leak or incorrect use of '#pragma omp parallel'?
• 2009-05-12 06:33 Re: Memory leak or incorrect use of '#pragma omp parallel'?
• 2009-05-17 06:34 Re: Memory leak or incorrect use of '#pragma omp parallel'?
• 2009-05-17 08:41 Re: Memory leak or incorrect use of '#pragma omp parallel'?

Mohamed Shafi

• 2009-05-27 07:22 Variable Length Execution Set?
• 2009-05-27 14:47 Re: Variable Length Execution Set?

Nicolas COLLIN

• 2009-05-07 09:47 Intermediate representation and egcs 1.1
• 2009-05-12 11:51 Intermediate representation
• 2009-05-14 11:18 Intermediate representation
• 2009-05-18 07:18 Intermediate representation and informations
• 2009-05-26 13:46 Intermediate representation
• 2009-05-26 13:48 Intermediate representation

NightStrike

• 2009-05-24 00:35 ICE during build of libobjc

Nitin Garg

• 2009-05-01 13:10 Problem with gcc-4.4.0 with Cortex-m3 and cortex-a9 cpu
• 2009-05-29 20:53 Problem with libpthread of uClibc

Oliver Kellogg

• 2009-05-03 21:14 Re: [gnat] reuse of ASTs already constructed
• 2009-05-03 21:22 Re: [gnat] reuse of ASTs already constructed
• 2009-05-04 05:31 Re: [gnat] reuse of ASTs already constructed
• 2009-05-09 19:58 Re: [gnat] reuse of ASTs already constructed

Olivier Hainque

• 2009-05-18 08:19 Re: Exception Handling description

Paolo Bonzini

• 2009-05-04 07:17 Re: Problems with in-tree host libraries (gmp, ppl, etc)
• 2009-05-04 13:36 Trunk freeze next Friday morning GMT for cond-optab merge
• 2009-05-05 06:20 Re: Problems with in-tree host libraries (gmp, ppl, etc)
• 2009-05-06 09:08 Re: opaque vector types?
• 2009-05-06 10:50 Re: Problems with in-tree host libraries (gmp, ppl, etc)
• 2009-05-06 15:36 Re: What precisely is the status of ppl/cloog anyway?
• 2009-05-06 16:20 Re: Setting ARM PIC register (Was: RE: GCC 4.5.0 Status Report (2009-05-05))
• 2009-05-06 17:19 archives broken?
• 2009-05-07 13:53 cond-optab merge delay? [was Re: GCC 4.5.0 Status Report (2009-05-05)]
• 2009-05-08 09:18 Re: Code optimization only in loops
• 2009-05-11 18:14 Re: naked zero_extracts longer than a word.
• 2009-05-11 18:15 Re: naked zero_extracts longer than a word.
• 2009-05-12 06:19 Trunk frozen for cond-optab merge
• 2009-05-12 08:32 Re: Code generation problem with optimizations enabled
• 2009-05-12 10:03 Re: Trunk unfrozen, cond-optab branch merged
• 2009-05-13 06:42 Re: New GCC releases comparison and comparison of GCC4.4 and LLVM2.5 on SPEC2000
• 2009-05-13 10:12 Re: New GCC releases comparison and comparison of GCC4.4 and LLVM2.5 on SPEC2000
• 2009-05-13 12:55 Re: New GCC releases comparison and comparison of GCC4.4 and LLVM2.5 on SPEC2000
• 2009-05-24 17:10 [RFC] removing statement walking from domwalk.c?

Paolo Carlini

• 2009-05-02 11:57 Re: exception propagation support not enabled in libstdc++ 4.4 on {armeabi,hppa,sparc}-linux
• 2009-05-02 12:13 Re: exception propagation support not enabled in libstdc++ 4.4 on {armeabi,hppa,sparc}-linux
• 2009-05-02 19:32 Re: exception propagation support not enabled in libstdc++ 4.4 on {armeabi,hppa,sparc}-linux
• 2009-05-02 21:28 Re: exception propagation support not enabled in libstdc++ 4.4 on {armeabi,hppa,sparc}-linux
• 2009-05-03 16:16 Re: exception propagation support not enabled in libstdc++ 4.4 on {armeabi,hppa,sparc}-linux
• 2009-05-05 16:01 Re: exception propagation support not enabled in libstdc++ 4.4 on {armeabi,hppa,sparc}-linux
• 2009-05-06 09:04 Re: exception propagation support not enabled in libstdc++ 4.4 on {armeabi,hppa,sparc}-linux
• 2009-05-17 17:25 Re: exception propagation support not enabled in libstdc++ 4.4 on {armeabi,hppa,sparc}-linux

Peter Dimov

• 2009-05-03 23:24 Re: Empty loops removal (Was Re: Some extra decorations)

Petros Panayi

• 2009-05-22 07:00 Adding new runtime library

Phil Fong

• 2009-05-25 22:52 arm926 branch cost

Piotr Wyderski

• 2009-05-08 13:56 [C++] Inheritance chain enumeration
• 2009-05-08 15:35 Re: [C++] Inheritance chain enumeration
• 2009-05-13 13:51 C++0x feature release plan
• 2009-05-25 15:06 Bugfix request
• 2009-05-25 22:25 Re: Bugfix request
• 2009-05-28 23:00 std::exception_ptr on Cygwin
• 2009-05-28 23:18 Re: std::exception_ptr on Cygwin

Pramod Joisha

• 2009-05-05 06:11 -combine o ption for C++ source s‏

Rafael Espindola

• 2009-05-08 11:40 Re: Finding gcc plugin headers
• 2009-05-12 09:48 Re: plugins callbacks and data
• 2009-05-12 21:59 Re: New GCC releases comparison and comparison of GCC4.4 and LLVM2.5 on SPEC2000

Rahul Kharche

• 2009-05-22 13:57 RE: [4.5] Find more autoinc addressing for induction variables
• 2009-05-22 15:17 RE: [4.5] Find more autoinc addressing for induction variables
• 2009-05-22 15:47 RE: [4.5] Find more autoinc addressing for induction variables

Ralf Wildenhues

• 2009-05-06 16:15 Re: [JAVA,libtool] Big libjava is biiiig.
• 2009-05-06 20:10 Re: exception propagation support not enabled in libstdc++ 4.4 on {armeabi,hppa,sparc}-linux
• 2009-05-07 21:49 Re: [JAVA,libtool] Big libjava is biiiig.

Ramana Radhakrishnan

• 2009-05-01 13:20 RE: Problem with gcc-4.4.0 with Cortex-m3 and cortex-a9 cpu
• 2009-05-06 15:27 RE: GCC 4.5.0 Status Report (2009-05-05)
• 2009-05-07 08:29 RE: Setting ARM PIC register (Was: RE: GCC 4.5.0 Status Report (2009-05-05))
• 2009-05-08 14:09 RE: Multilib for ARM in thumb2 mode
• 2009-05-08 14:57 RE: cond-optab merge delay? [was Re: GCC 4.5.0 Status Report (2009-05-05)]

Richard Earnshaw

• 2009-05-06 15:06 Re: GCC 4.5.0 Status Report (2009-05-05)
• 2009-05-06 15:47 RE: GCC 4.5.0 Status Report (2009-05-05)
• 2009-05-06 15:51 Re: GCC 4.5.0 Status Report (2009-05-05)
• 2009-05-06 15:58 RE: GCC 4.5.0 Status Report (2009-05-05)
• 2009-05-06 16:05 Re: Setting ARM PIC register (Was: RE: GCC 4.5.0 Status Report (2009-05-05))
• 2009-05-06 16:33 Re: Setting ARM PIC register (Was: RE: GCC 4.5.0 Status Report (2009-05-05))

Richard Guenther

• 2009-05-01 19:32 Re: [RFC] Thoughts on reordering the source tree
• 2009-05-04 14:14 Re: Trunk freeze next Friday morning GMT for cond-optab merge
• 2009-05-05 09:36 Re: -combine option for C++ sources‏
• 2009-05-05 09:47 Re: [Announcement] Creating lightweight IPO branch
• 2009-05-06 09:00 Re: [Announcement] Creating lightweight IPO branch
• 2009-05-06 15:49 Re: GCC 4.5.0 Status Report (2009-05-05)
• 2009-05-06 16:31 Re: [JAVA,libtool] Big libjava is biiiig.
• 2009-05-06 18:53 Re: [RFC] Get rid of awkward semantics for subtypes
• 2009-05-06 19:17 Re: [RFC] Get rid of awkward semantics for subtypes
• 2009-05-06 19:57 Re: [RFC] Get rid of awkward semantics for subtypes
• 2009-05-06 21:24 Re: [graphite] Weekly phone call notes
• 2009-05-07 13:26 Re: An optimization question
• 2009-05-09 20:42 Re: Interest in integer auto-upcasting pass for normalization and optimization?
• 2009-05-09 20:43 Re: Interest in integer auto-upcasting pass for normalization and optimization?
• 2009-05-12 09:28 Re: Trouble building Graphite
• 2009-05-13 12:11 Re: New GCC releases comparison and comparison of GCC4.4 and LLVM2.5 on SPEC2000
• 2009-05-16 09:25 Re: optimization question
• 2009-05-16 09:38 Re: optimization question
• 2009-05-16 09:49 Re: optimization question
• 2009-05-18 13:10 Re: Fortran bootstrap broken
• 2009-05-19 08:28 Re: optimization question
• 2009-05-19 12:57 Re: Type-punning warnings [was Re: PATCH: silence warnings in unwind-dw2-fde.c]
• 2009-05-19 14:25 Re: [PATCH][RFC] Adjust the middle-end memory model
• 2009-05-20 08:27 Re: [PATCH][RFC] Adjust the middle-end memory model
• 2009-05-20 08:40 Re: REC: gimplify - create a temp that is set at outermost block?
• 2009-05-20 18:15 Re: [PATCH][RFC] Adjust the middle-end memory model
• 2009-05-21 10:21 Re: -Wcast-qual and casting away
• 2009-05-21 11:51 GCC 4.4.1 Status Report (2009-05-21)
• 2009-05-21 11:58 Re: -Wcast-qual and casting away
• 2009-05-22 09:11 Re: [PATCH][RFC] Adjust the middle-end memory model
• 2009-05-24 12:03 Re: problem with getting statements (DECL_SAVED_TREE?)
• 2009-05-24 12:41 Re: problem with getting statements (DECL_SAVED_TREE?)
• 2009-05-24 17:18 Re: [RFC] removing statement walking from domwalk.c?

Richard Kenner

• 2009-05-01 12:20 Re: [RFC] Thoughts on reordering the source tree

Robert Dewar

• 2009-05-03 21:17 Re: [gnat] reuse of ASTs already constructed
• 2009-05-04 01:14 Re: [gnat] reuse of ASTs already constructed
• 2009-05-09 20:09 Re: [gnat] reuse of ASTs already constructed
• 2009-05-25 19:05 Re: Bugfix request

Roberto Bagnara

• 2009-05-06 08:11 Re: Problems with in-tree host libraries (gmp, ppl, etc)
• 2009-05-12 16:39 Re: Trouble building Graphite
• 2009-05-12 16:47 Re: Graphite build fails if PPL configured with --disable-shared

SaguenayLac . com

• 2009-05-22 00:20 Votre publicité sur le Portail SaguenayLac.com

Samuel Tardieu

• 2009-05-06 10:07 Multilib for ARM in thumb2 mode
• 2009-05-08 14:31 Re: Multilib for ARM in thumb2 mode

santosh k

• 2009-05-21 03:05 Issue on Solaris box

sean darcy

• 2009-05-27 05:03 4.4: march-native gives -mno-sse4, but cpuinfo sse4_1

Sebastian Pop

• 2009-05-12 21:39 Re: Trouble building Graphite

Sebastian Redl

• 2009-05-15 21:00 Re: Exception Handling description
• 2009-05-21 12:16 Re: -Wcast-qual and casting away

Seema Ravandale

• 2009-05-15 05:36 Updates: Workshop on Essential Abstractions in GCC, 2009

Stelian Pop

• 2009-05-06 16:15 Issues with testsuite on constant pointer arithmetics
• 2009-05-06 19:58 Re: Issues with testsuite on constant pointer arithmetics
• 2009-05-06 21:55 Re: Issues with testsuite on constant pointer arithmetics
• 2009-05-06 23:07 Re: Issues with testsuite on constant pointer arithmetics

Steve Ellcey

• 2009-05-20 21:48 fixincludes & sed question
• 2009-05-29 16:02 RFC: Option handling and PR 37565
• 2009-05-29 16:59 Re: RFC: Option handling and PR 37565
• 2009-05-29 18:00 Re: RFC: Option handling and PR 37565

Steven Bosscher

• 2009-05-01 12:05 [RFC] Thoughts on reordering the source tree
• 2009-05-01 14:02 Re: [RFC] Thoughts on reordering the source tree
• 2009-05-01 16:39 Re: [RFC] Thoughts on reordering the source tree
• 2009-05-01 16:55 Re: [RFC] Thoughts on reordering the source tree
• 2009-05-01 17:16 Re: [RFC] Thoughts on reordering the source tree
• 2009-05-01 20:46 Re: [RFC] Thoughts on reordering the source tree
• 2009-05-07 20:46 Re: [RFC] Thoughts on reordering the source tree
• 2009-05-12 22:09 Re: New GCC releases comparison and comparison of GCC4.4 and LLVM2.5 on SPEC2000
• 2009-05-13 11:58 Re: New GCC releases comparison and comparison of GCC4.4 and LLVM2.5 on SPEC2000

Tim Prince

• 2009-05-06 14:56 Re: Bootstrap broken by ppl/cloog config problem: finds non-system/non-standard "/include" dir
• 2009-05-06 15:52 Re: Bootstrap broken by ppl/cloog config problem: finds non-system/non-standard "/include" dir
• 2009-05-06 23:39 Re: Bootstrap broken by ppl/cloog config problem: finds non-system/non-standard "/include" dir
• 2009-05-08 23:00 Re: [Fwd: Failure in bootstrapping gfortran-4.5 on Cygwin]

Tobias Burnus

• 2009-05-18 13:06 Re: Fortran bootstrap broken
• 2009-05-30 17:58 Re: [fortran] Different FUNC_DECLS with the same DECL_NAME - MAIN__ and named PROGRAM main functions [was Re: gcc-4.5-20090528 is now available]
• 2009-05-30 18:45 Re: [fortran] Different FUNC_DECLS with the same DECL_NAME - MAIN__ and named PROGRAM main functions [was Re: gcc-4.5-20090528 is now available]
• 2009-05-30 19:07 Re: [fortran] Different FUNC_DECLS with the same DECL_NAME - MAIN__ and named PROGRAM main functions [was Re: gcc-4.5-20090528 is now available]

Tobias Grosser

• 2009-05-06 21:16 [graphite] Weekly phone call notes

Tom Browder

• 2009-05-01 11:58 Re: gcc-4.4.0 Build Report: Success on Open Solaris 2008.11, x86_64

Tom Tromey

• 2009-05-08 19:07 Re: [gnat] reuse of ASTs already constructed
• 2009-05-20 15:11 Re: [RFC] enabling -fshow-column by default

Toon Moene

• 2009-05-11 19:17 Re: naked zero_extracts longer than a word.
• 2009-05-15 19:13 Re: New GCC releases comparison and comparison of GCC4.4 and LLVM2.5 on SPEC2000
• 2009-05-17 13:26 Re: [lto] Enabling LTO in selected testsuite directories

Ulrich Weigand

• 2009-05-30 16:43 Re: Problems with sibling calls

Uros Bizjak

• 2009-05-24 09:04 Re: What does zero-length array mean at file scope?

VandeVondele Joost

• 2009-05-16 08:28 optimization question
• 2009-05-16 09:29 Re: optimization question
• 2009-05-16 09:42 Re: optimization question

Vincent Lefevre

• 2009-05-26 01:47 Re: New GCC releases comparison and comparison of GCC4.4 and LLVM2.5 on SPEC2000

Vladimir Makarov

• 2009-05-07 18:06 Re: scheduling question
• 2009-05-07 18:08 Re: scheduling question
• 2009-05-07 19:33 Re: CONSTRAINT__LIMIT
• 2009-05-12 13:56 New GCC releases comparison and comparison of GCC4.4 and LLVM2.5 on SPEC2000
• 2009-05-12 18:05 Re: New GCC releases comparison and comparison of GCC4.4 and LLVM2.5 on SPEC2000
• 2009-05-12 18:21 Re: New GCC releases comparison and comparison of GCC4.4 and LLVM2.5 on SPEC2000
• 2009-05-12 19:25 Re: New GCC releases comparison and comparison of GCC4.4 and LLVM2.5 on SPEC2000
• 2009-05-13 15:14 Re: New GCC releases comparison and comparison of GCC4.4 and LLVM2.5 on SPEC2000

WEB MASTER

• 2009-05-14 11:14 Maintenance/Upgrading
• 2009-05-14 11:53 Maintenance/Upgrading

Weddington, Eric

• 2009-05-28 09:35 Accessing called function attributes in FUNCTION_ARG macro

william xiao

• 2009-05-24 09:07 a strange make error

Xinliang David Li

• 2009-05-05 05:01 [Announcement] Creating lightweight IPO branch
• 2009-05-05 17:25 Re: [Announcement] Creating lightweight IPO branch
• 2009-05-05 17:56 Re: [Announcement] Creating lightweight IPO branch
• 2009-05-05 18:00 Re: [Announcement] Creating lightweight IPO branch
• 2009-05-07 18:44 Fwd: [Announcement] Creating lightweight IPO branch

Indexes:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav:	[Browse other archives for this mailing list] [Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to: This time period only This mailing list only All mailing lists Entire site (no limit)