This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PPL-devel] PPL broken for Canadian-cross builds
- From: Sebastian Pop <sebpop at gmail dot com>
- To: Ryan Hill <dirtyepic at gentoo dot org>
- Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 00:02:43 -0500
- Subject: Re: [PPL-devel] PPL broken for Canadian-cross builds
- References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0903192140100.28541@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <49C3326A.80107@cs.unipr.it> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0903201249050.2556@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <49CF5F54.6080806@cs.unipr.it> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0903291627120.2965@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <cb9d34b20903291211w18440fc1i6e37393c5f26abcf@mail.gmail.com> <20090331204136.03ab5f53@halo.dirtyepic.sk.ca>
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 21:41, Ryan Hill <dirtyepic@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On Sun, 29 Mar 2009 14:11:37 -0500
> Sebastian Pop <sebpop@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I committed the attached fix to the cloog-ppl repo, and I will prepare
>> a new tar.gz for the gcc infrastructure.
>
> Is changing the contents of the tarball without changing the name going
> to be a habit or just something we'll have to live with until release?
Sorry to not have paid attention to this: Joseph Myers already warned
me about this.
> It wrecks havoc with our (Gentoo's) manifest system and I'll have to
> host a copy here if it's going to continue to be modified without a
> version bump.
>
I will call the next package cloog-ppl-0.15.2.tar.gz
Would that work for you?
Sebastian