This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13)


Richard Kenner wrote:
Of course, just I (and others) don't see why they should do it in this
case. Delaying a *branch* is different from, say, using a proprietary
version control or bug tracking system.

I don't either. Requesting a delay of a *release* on a license issue
is completely and perfectly understandable, but what that has to do
with making a *branch* makes absolutely no sense to me.
Agreed. I'll note nobody has really argued that delaying a branch to deal with a license issue makes any sense. The FSF itself hasn't even stated reasons for their stance. That may simply be because the issue is expected to be moot after the weekend meetings.

What I find most distressing about this whole discussion is the fact that we have developers who don't seem to grasp that the FSF owns the copyright to GCC and we are effectively volunteering to work in the FSF's sandbox under certain rules and guidelines set forth by the FSF.

Jeff


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]