This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13)
What about allowing for more backports from the graphite
branch if this drags out for an extended period of time? In
particular, I am thinking of those changes in graphite branch
that might reduce those cases where -fgraphite-identity
degrades the performance of the resulting code.
Jack
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 11:10:07AM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> NightStrike wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 13, 2009@1:58 PM, Joseph S. Myers
> > <joseph@codesourcery.com> wrote:
> >> Given the SC request we need to stay in Stage 4 rather than trying to work
> >> around it.
> >
> > What if GCC went back to stage 3 until the issue is resolved, thus
> > opening the door for a number of stage3-type patches that don't affect
> > 1) licensing and 2) plugin frameworks, but are merely bug fixes which
> > would have long been shaken out by now.
>
> No, not@all. The only benefit we're having from this is that GCC 4.4
> should be quite stable already in GCC 4.4.0, let's not destroy this one too.
>
> Paolo