This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13)

From: Joe Buck <Joe dot Buck at synopsys dot COM>
To: Richard Guenther <rguenther at suse dot de>
Cc: Dave Korn <dave dot korn dot cygwin at googlemail dot com>, "gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 11:28:04 -0700
Subject: Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13)
References: <alpine.LNX.2.00.0903131702240.1206@zhemvz.fhfr.qr> <571f6b510903130930k93dd681ib9bc843851953d16@mail.gmail.com> <6c33472e0903130942h18532487mdeb2c34864dffabc@mail.gmail.com> <49BA9841.3080803@gmail.com> <alpine.LNX.2.00.0903131824210.1206@zhemvz.fhfr.qr>

On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 10:25:34AM -0700, Richard Guenther wrote:
> The topmost sentence should be unambiguous.  Yes, the SC asked us not
> to branch.

The request came from RMS, the SC just passed it on.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13)
  - From: Daniel Berlin

References:
- GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13)
  - From: Richard Guenther
- Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13)
  - From: Steven Bosscher
- Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13)
  - From: Manuel López-Ibáñez
- Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13)
  - From: Richard Guenther

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]