This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

missing return statement


Hello,
 
So many times I write code like this:
 
SomeType function()
{
    SomeType result;
    // do something with result
    return result;
}
 
except I often forget the "return result" statement.
 
Why does gcc not give an error about this?
If I compile with "-Wall", it will give a WARNING saying
"control reaches end of non-void function".
 
However, shouldn't it be an ERROR to return nothing
from a function that's supposed to return something?
Does this not result in undefined behaviour? Why goes gcc allow it?
 
Thanks,
Nate.
_________________________________________________________________
Share photos with friends on Windows Live Messenger
http://go.microsoft.com/?linkid=9650734


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]