This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Revision 144098 (d.d. Wed Feb 11 08:56:41 2009 UTC (4 weeks ago)) is not a regression bug fix.

From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>
To: Toon Moene <moene at knmi dot nl>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <bonzini at gnu dot org>, Toon Moene <toon at moene dot org>, Steven Bosscher <stevenb dot gcc at gmail dot com>, Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>, gcc mailing list <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 06:41:42 -0700
Subject: Re: Revision 144098 (d.d. Wed Feb 11 08:56:41 2009 UTC (4 weeks ago)) is not a regression bug fix.
References: <49B832FA.9050606@moene.org> <84fc9c000903111510l19a29e7fg93bb4d16770fa556@mail.gmail.com> <49B83925.1060603@moene.org> <571f6b510903111532x60213af8k9573da2cc842725e@mail.gmail.com> <49B8428F.3030500@moene.org> <6dc9ffc80903111608s2da8a5f1iccaf6b69d4018304@mail.gmail.com> <49B84746.3050102@moene.org> <49B8CA6F.1080905@gnu.org> <49B8CC6E.2050903@knmi.nl>

On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 1:48 AM, Toon Moene <moene@knmi.nl> wrote:

>
> Ah, but it did: throwing out the second peephole (in stead of both) fixed
> the problem too.
>

Is a bug opened for this? If not, please open one.

Thanks.



-- 
H.J.

References:
- Revision 144098 (d.d. Wed Feb 11 08:56:41 2009 UTC (4 weeks ago)) is not a regression bug fix.
  - From: Toon Moene
- Re: Revision 144098 (d.d. Wed Feb 11 08:56:41 2009 UTC (4 weeks ago)) is not a regression bug fix.
  - From: Richard Guenther
- Re: Revision 144098 (d.d. Wed Feb 11 08:56:41 2009 UTC (4 weeks ago)) is not a regression bug fix.
  - From: Toon Moene
- Re: Revision 144098 (d.d. Wed Feb 11 08:56:41 2009 UTC (4 weeks ago)) is not a regression bug fix.
  - From: Steven Bosscher
- Re: Revision 144098 (d.d. Wed Feb 11 08:56:41 2009 UTC (4 weeks ago)) is not a regression bug fix.
  - From: Toon Moene
- Re: Revision 144098 (d.d. Wed Feb 11 08:56:41 2009 UTC (4 weeks ago)) is not a regression bug fix.
  - From: H.J. Lu
- Re: Revision 144098 (d.d. Wed Feb 11 08:56:41 2009 UTC (4 weeks ago)) is not a regression bug fix.
  - From: Toon Moene
- Re: Revision 144098 (d.d. Wed Feb 11 08:56:41 2009 UTC (4 weeks ago)) is not a regression bug fix.
  - From: Paolo Bonzini
- Re: Revision 144098 (d.d. Wed Feb 11 08:56:41 2009 UTC (4 weeks ago)) is not a regression bug fix.
  - From: Toon Moene

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]