This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Revision 144098 (d.d. Wed Feb 11 08:56:41 2009 UTC (4 weeks ago)) is not a regression bug fix.
- From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>
- To: Steven Bosscher <stevenb dot gcc at gmail dot com>
- Cc: Toon Moene <toon at moene dot org>, gcc mailing list <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 15:52:57 -0700
- Subject: Re: Revision 144098 (d.d. Wed Feb 11 08:56:41 2009 UTC (4 weeks ago)) is not a regression bug fix.
- References: <49B832FA.9050606@moene.org> <571f6b510903111503k74c5e1ecgb9e3c8e8345e848b@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 3:03 PM, Steven Bosscher <stevenb.gcc@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 10:54 PM, Toon Moene <toon@moene.org> wrote:
>> Unless a very good reason is in my inbox in the next 48 hours, I'll revert
>> this change under the obvious rule.
>
> It was a regression fix.
> See http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-02/msg00299.html
>
> This took 2 minutes to find out. although it would have been helpful
> if the PR number was in the commit log and ChangeLog.
>
I added the missing PR number in ChangeLog. I am not sure how
much it helps :-(.
--
H.J.