This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: The gcc-in-cxx branch now completes bootstrap

From: Ben Elliston <bje at au1 dot ibm dot com>
To: "Kaveh R. GHAZI" <ghazi at caip dot rutgers dot edu>
Cc: Ian Lance Taylor <iant at google dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 11:16:31 +1100
Subject: Re: The gcc-in-cxx branch now completes bootstrap
References: <m3eixa9hlq.fsf@google.com> <Pine.GSO.4.58.0903071009430.19909@caipclassic.rutgers.edu>

> I'm curious whether there are any detectable differences in the resulting
> compiler when built with g++ rather than gcc.  E.g. testsuite regressions,
> changes in the speed or size of cc1, etc.  Also, is cc1 linked with
> libstdc++.so ?  Stuff like that.

Also, is there any significant difference in bootstrap times?

Ben

Follow-Ups:
- Re: The gcc-in-cxx branch now completes bootstrap
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor

References:
- The gcc-in-cxx branch now completes bootstrap
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: The gcc-in-cxx branch now completes bootstrap
  - From: Kaveh R. GHAZI

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]