This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH]: GCC Scheduler support for R10000 on MIPS
- From: David Daney <ddaney at avtrex dot com>
- To: Kumba <kumba at gentoo dot org>
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, mips at gentoo dot org, rdsandiford at googlemail dot com, GCC Mailing List <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 09:31:39 -0700
- Subject: Re: [PATCH]: GCC Scheduler support for R10000 on MIPS
- References: <48926C7B.8060607@gentoo.org> <87hca3ycgt.fsf@firetop.home> <489527D7.6030507@gentoo.org> <87k5ey5qmg.fsf@firetop.home> <4896AD65.1030406@gentoo.org> <87r694sirj.fsf@firetop.home> <4897BCB9.9010806@gentoo.org> <87myjrs5v0.fsf@firetop.home> <489935DD.3060707@gentoo.org> <87sktg1rzz.fsf@firetop.home> <489BE3AC.7020908@gentoo.org> <87bq02d1ns.fsf@firetop.home> <48A26993.1010605@gentoo.org> <87bpzt5rrs.fsf@firetop.home> <48A919B8.1050306@gentoo.org>
Kumba wrote:
Richard Sandiford wrote:
OK otherwise. Do you have a copyright assignment on file?
Nope. Is there something I need to fill out and e-mail to someone?
Yes there is. I'm not sure if Richard can cause them to be sent to you, but certainly requesting copyright assignment documents on gcc@gcc.gnu.org would work. It can often take many weeks to get them processed, so starting as soon as possible would be a good idea.
Do I need to put my name and the name of the author of the very original
gcc-3.0 patch in this file as well?
It would depend on if any of the original patch code remains. If so, probably a copyright assignment for the original author would be required as well (at least that is my understanding).
David Daney