This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Update libtool?
Hi Ralf,
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> * Peter O'Gorman wrote on Wed, Aug 06, 2008 at 06:26:15PM CEST:
>> Jack Howarth wrote:
>>> On Wed, Aug 06, 2008 at 11:17:03AM -0500, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
>>>> I wonder what the chances are of moving mainline gcc to a newer libtool
>>>> version? Introducing the darwin bits piecemeal would not be particularly
>>>> fun.
>>> You are going to fix this on gcc trunk in any case, right?
>> If there is a consensus that now is not the time to update libtool in
>> trunk, then I will have to :)
>
> First off, I am not in a position to decide anything here, so the
> following is just my two cents:
>
> I would be a bit concerned to update libtool in branch-4_3. Is this
> issue a regression?
I have no intention of asking that libtool be updated in the 4.3 branch.
I do not consider it a regression, it has always been broken on Mac OS X
when using dwarf2.
> I haven't tried GCC trunk with libtool 2.2.4 yet, but I guess that
> should be reasonably smooth. (Of course I'd be willing to try.)
I am also willing to try.
>
> AFAICS there are no GCC-specific changes in these files:
> libtool.m4 ltmain.sh lt~obsolete.m4 ltoptions.m4 ltsugar.m4 ltversion.m4
> (there has been a patch to libtool.m4 but it was subsequently backed out
> again.)
Good to know. Thanks.
Peter
--
Peter O'Gorman
http://pogma.com