This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Recent libstdc++ regressions

From: Paolo Carlini <paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com>
To: Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin dot org>
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 19:17:26 +0200
Subject: Re: Recent libstdc++ regressions
References: <9769735.1215613876152.JavaMail.oracle@acsmt304.oracle.com> <4aca3dc20807090958v4f5eff9ax8edef455fe613a9c@mail.gmail.com>

Hi,

This is likely to have been my patch. I'm minimizing the check_construct_destroy failure right now. If someone could give me some idea of what is causing the execution failures while i do that, i may be able to fix them faster :)

Thanks for fixing the check_construct_destroy problem.

I would suggest concentrating next on the vector/bool failure, which is about a standard feature, not an extension. Frankly, I don't have any special advice, the testcase is pretty straightforward...

Paolo.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Recent libstdc++ regressions
  - From: Daniel Berlin

References:
- Recent libstdc++ regressions
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: Recent libstdc++ regressions
  - From: Daniel Berlin

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]