This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Should we remove java from the default bootstrap languages?

From: David Miller <davem at davemloft dot net>
To: Ralf dot Wildenhues at gmx dot de
Cc: stevenb dot gcc at gmail dot com, ghazi at caip dot rutgers dot edu, dnovillo at google dot com, tromey at redhat dot com, aph at redhat dot com, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 09:07:40 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: Should we remove java from the default bootstrap languages?
References: <571f6b510806201509n5e975d3fm5a39dd5532af6095@mail.gmail.com> <20080620.152603.221773382.davem@davemloft.net> <20080621085855.GA30376@ins.uni-bonn.de>

From: Ralf Wildenhues <Ralf.Wildenhues@gmx.de>
Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 10:58:55 +0200

> Would that be compiles of object files that end up in libgcj (as opposed
> to the link, or stuff that depends on libgcj)?  If yes, the lack of
> parallelism should be fixable.

It's the compilation of the object files, not the linking.

References:
- Re: Should we remove java from the default bootstrap languages?
  - From: Steven Bosscher
- Re: Should we remove java from the default bootstrap languages?
  - From: David Miller
- Re: Should we remove java from the default bootstrap languages?
  - From: Ralf Wildenhues

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]