This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [whopr] Design/implementation alternatives for the driver and WPA



On Jun 5, 2008, at 2:03 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:


Nick Kledzik <kledzik@apple.com> writes:

How does the linker tell LTO that a symbol may be inlined, but must
also be externally visible?
The linker just tells LTO which symbols must remain. The LTO engine
is free to inline anything that would improve codegen, with the
exception
that any weak definition that must remain (preserved) cannot be inlined.

I'll just note that that isn't optimal for ELF when producing an executable.

Why? Because you have to touch (worst case) every symbol? The cost of doing LTO *dramatically* dwarfs the cost of touching symbols once. :) You're right this could be improved, and we're actively working on it... but it seems like a strange thing to worry about vs correctness in all cases.


-Chris


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]