This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

why don't have 'umul' rtx code

From: "Eric Fisher" <joefoxreal at gmail dot com>
To: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2008 17:18:48 +0800
Subject: why don't have 'umul' rtx code

hi

I'm not clear why we have 'udiv', but don't have 'umul' for Standard
Pattern Names. Does I need to define a nameless pattern for it?

Thanks in advance.

eric

Follow-Ups:
- Re: why don't have 'umul' rtx code
  - From: Paolo Bonzini

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]