This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: gcc 4.3.0 i386 default question
> David Edelsohn wrote:
> >>>>>>Joel Sherrill writes:
> >>>>>>
> >
> >Joel> Those all look like checks to see if the compiler itself
> >Joel> supports Altivec -- not a run-time check on the hardware
> >Joel> like the Neon check_effective_target_arm_neon_hw appears
> >Joel> to be.
> >
> > Look at check_vmx_hw_available again.
> >
> Whoops. That one does indeed check it. And the RTEMS
> target has an ugly exception. The next set of failures below
> that point are not altivec related. I see a block of failures
> like this:
>
> FAIL: gcc.misc-tests/bprob-1.c execution: file bprob-1.gcda does not
> exist, -fprofile-arcs
>
> And this:
>
> FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/405-mullhw-1.c scan-assembler mullhw
>
> Are those things which would be expected to fail on a vanilla
> 603e target without networking or disk?
branch probability test expect the testcase to output a profile during
execution, so unless you have gcov runtime support I guess it is
expected. I dunno about mullhw.
Honza
>
> Is this another category of tests to avoid somehow?
>
> -joel
> >David
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Joel Sherrill, Ph.D. Director of Research & Development
> joel.sherrill@OARcorp.com On-Line Applications Research
> Ask me about RTEMS: a free RTOS Huntsville AL 35805
> Support Available (256) 722-9985
>