This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: RTL definition
2008/3/10, Jim Wilson <firstname.lastname@example.org>:
> Fran Baena wrote:
> > RTL represents a low-level language, machine-independent. But I didn't
> > find any especification of such language represented. This is, I found
> > no document where the language represented were described or defined
> > in a grammar way.
> RTL isn't a programming language, and hence has no grammar. It is
> merely one of the internal representations that gcc uses for optimizing
> and generating code. We do have gcc internals documentation that you
> have already been pointed at.
i agree with you, RTL is not a programming language, is a language
that is represented internally. But it could match a grammar
definition. And this is my question, what is the process to define a