This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: birthpoints in rtl.

From: "Steven Bosscher" <stevenb dot gcc at gmail dot com>
To: "Ian Lance Taylor" <iant at google dot com>
Cc: "Paolo Bonzini" <bonzini at gnu dot org>, "Kenneth Zadeck" <zadeck at naturalbridge dot com>, gcc <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>, "Park, Seongbae" <seongbae dot park at gmail dot com>, "Richard Sandiford" <rsandifo at nildram dot co dot uk>
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 22:55:09 +0100
Subject: Re: birthpoints in rtl.
References: <47C5EF2A.5020401@naturalbridge.com> <47C6B132.3090903@naturalbridge.com> <47C6B7D6.9090509@gnu.org> <571f6b510802281235h17cf22b6vb63f1fc8689c3a8@mail.gmail.com> <m3bq60reyt.fsf@localhost.localdomain> <571f6b510802281245l2d477d6bgcec66e7802db3981@mail.gmail.com> <m37igorbnr.fsf@localhost.localdomain>

On 28 Feb 2008 13:52:56 -0800, Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com> wrote:
>  I think it's probably a blocker issue on 32-bit x86 until we complete
>  the lower subreg work to track subreg lifetimes to detect no-conflict
>  sections manually.  I have an implementation of that written before
>  DF, and I haven't found the time to upgrade it to the DF framework.

OK. Then I'm not going to work on removing libcall notes.  If it's
still necessary to have them, well, you know, it's kinda pointless ;-)

Gr.
Steven

References:
- birthpoints in rtl.
  - From: Kenneth Zadeck
- Re: birthpoints in rtl.
  - From: Kenneth Zadeck
- Re: birthpoints in rtl.
  - From: Paolo Bonzini
- Re: birthpoints in rtl.
  - From: Steven Bosscher
- Re: birthpoints in rtl.
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: birthpoints in rtl.
  - From: Steven Bosscher
- Re: birthpoints in rtl.
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]