This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2008-02-14)
- From: Joel Sherrill <joel dot sherrill at oarcorp dot com>
- To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
- Cc: "gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 09:43:17 -0600
- Subject: Re: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2008-02-14)
- References: <20080214114742.GA4442@sunsite.mff.cuni.cz>
Any chance of someone with ARM knowledge dealing with
this issue before the branch is cut.
Uros Bizjak thinks it is just a typo in an assembly file
but no one who has commented on this PR is comfortable
Just a wild guess, could this be a typo?Thanks.
[uros@localhost arm]$ grep do_itt *
ieee754-df.S: do_itt eq
ieee754-sf.S: do_itt eq
However, we have:
lib1funcs.asm:.macro do_it cond, suffix=""
and many references to "do_it" macro in asm sources.
Jakub Jelinek wrote:
We are in Stage 3 and the trunk is open for regression and documentation
fixes only. We have reached our goal of zero open P1 regressions (in fact
several times, but each time different P1s appeared), so 4.3.0 release
candidate will be created early next week. There is still time to get
important bugfixes into the release candidate. On Monday
branches/gcc-4_3-branch will be created, and the trunk subsequently open for
Stage 1 of 4.4. 4.3 branch will be afterwards frozen until the release
candidate is created, any changes to the branch will require RM approval.
Progress has been made over the last 2.5 weeks, on P1 regressions
as well as P2 regressions.
Priority # Change from Last Report
-------- -- -----------------------
P1 0 - 2
P2 74 - 14
P3 4 + 2
----- -- -----------------------
Total 78 - 14
There are still 38 P4 and 91 P5 regressions, this is the last chance to get
them fixed before the release candidate.
Joel Sherrill, Ph.D. Director of Research & Development
joel.sherrill@OARcorp.com On-Line Applications Research
Ask me about RTEMS: a free RTOS Huntsville AL 35805
Support Available (256) 722-9985