This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Changes in C++ FE regarding pedwarns to be errors are harmful

From: Ismail DÃnmez <ismail at pardus dot org dot tr>
To: Andreas Schwab <schwab at suse dot de>
Cc: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at cs dot tamu dot edu>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, Manuel LÃpez-IbÃÃez <lopezibanez at gmail dot com>
Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 18:10:30 +0200
Subject: Re: Changes in C++ FE regarding pedwarns to be errors are harmful
References: <200801082328.22849.ismail@pardus.org.tr> <200801131734.42932.ismail@pardus.org.tr> <jebq7phfw7.fsf@sykes.suse.de>

Sunday 13 January 2008 18:03:20 tarihinde Andreas Schwab ÅunlarÄ yazmÄÅtÄ:
> Ismail DÃnmez <ismail@pardus.org.tr> writes:
> > That was just an example, real life testcase shows that problem stems
> > from autoconf and its config.h. Projects end up defining things like
> > HAVE_STDLIB_H twice which is not harmful at all but now causes an error
> > if g++ is used.
>
> Redefinitions with the same replacement list are not an error.

Ok but that still doesn't cover the general use of

#define PACKAGE_NAME foobar

etc.

Regards,
ismail

-- 
Never learn by your mistakes, if you do you may never dare to try again.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Changes in C++ FE regarding pedwarns to be errors are harmful
  - From: Richard Guenther
- Re: Changes in C++ FE regarding pedwarns to be errors are harmful
  - From: Paolo Bonzini

References:
- Changes in C++ FE regarding pedwarns to be errors are harmful
  - From: Ismail DÃnmez
- Re: Changes in C++ FE regarding pedwarns to be errors are harmful
  - From: Ismail Dönmez
- Re: Changes in C++ FE regarding pedwarns to be errors are harmful
  - From: Andreas Schwab

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]